Skip to content

Study on the Effectiveness of a School-Based Fat Loss Program for Adolescents

Study of the Effectiveness of an Exercise Intervention Oriented Toward Fat Loss in Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06524908
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-07-29
Start date
2022-09-10
Completion date
2023-02-01
Last updated
2025-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention

Brief summary

The students were divided into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group attended fat loss exercise classes three times a week and the parents cooperated with us in dietary monitoring and control. Before and after the intervention, questionnaires were completed, physical fitness and body composition were measured, and physical activity measurement bracelets were worn for 4 days. In this study, it is possible to know the mental health state, physical activity habits, body composition and physical fitness of adolescents.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALExercise and dietary calorie restriction

The intervention group received an exercise intervention three times a week (resistance exercise from 4:30-5:00 p.m. and aerobic exercise from 5:00-5:30 p.m.), and a caloric restriction intervention (guided semi-libre diet with caloric intake restricted to 75% of overall consumption, with parents keeping track of calories and food groups and receiving regular check-ups)

Sponsors

Aiyoudong Children and Youth Sports Health Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Passed PAR-Q questionnaire screening * No professional sports experience * Able to understand the test * Voluntarily participate in the entire testing process

Exclusion criteria

* Serious organic pathology of the heart, brain, lungs, kidneys, and locomotor system * Taking medication for a chronic condition * Have history of psychiatric disorders * Inability to complete follow-up visits or poor adherence.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body fat percentage (%)From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksMeasured by Inbody, a body composition tester using bioelectrical impedance, in %.
Physical fitnessFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksMeasured using China National Standards for Students' Physical Health (2014 revision), with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 100, higher scores respond to better fitness.
Physical activityFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksPhysical activity (PA) was measured using Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers, with data expressed as minutes per day (min/day).
Fat-free massFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksMeasured by Inbody, a body composition tester using bioelectrical impedance, in kg.
Fat massFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksMeasured by Inbody, a body composition tester using bioelectrical impedance, in kg.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Salivary testosteroneFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksSalivary testosterone levels were measured using radioimmunoassay (RIA) and expressed in picograms per liter (pg/L).
Exercise Self-EfficacyFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksExercise Self-Efficacy Scale . The minimum score is 18 and the maximum score is 180. The higher the score, the stronger the self-efficacy in exercise and the better the result.
ResilienceFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksConnor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD-RISC-10). The scale consists of 10 items, each of which has a score range of 0-4, and the total score range of the scale is 0-40, with higher scores representing greater resilience.
Self-esteemFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksThe Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was used, with a total of 10 items. Scores on the scale range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-esteem and better outcomes.
AggressionFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksAssessed using the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire with a total score range of 29-145. The higher the score, the more aggressive the individual is in that area and the worse the outcome.
Eating Self-efficacyFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeksEating Self-Efficacy Scale . The minimum score is 10 and the maximum score is 100. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy in eating and better outcomes.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026