Skip to content

Pectopexy Autologous Vs Mesh

Pectopexy Autologous Vs Mesh

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06524700
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-07-29
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2024-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uterine Prolapse, Vault Prolapse, Vaginal

Keywords

vault, uterine, prolapse

Brief summary

prospective comparative study describing using autologous graft for uterine- vault - cervical suspension vs mesh in treatment of apical prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDUREpectopexy mesh

pectopexy with mesh

PROCEDUREpectopexy autologous

pectopexy using autologous graft

Sponsors

Armed forces hospital wadi aldwaser
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

uterine - vault prolapse \-

Exclusion criteria

* previous vaginal repair for uterine or vaginal prolapse previous suspension procedures for apical prolapse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
POP-Q3 monthassesment of degree of prolapse correction after surgery

Countries

Egypt, Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026