Skip to content

Comparison of Non-invasive Respiratory Monitoring System (RMS) to Capnography for Respiratory Rate (RR)

Comparison of Non-invasive Respiratory Monitoring System (RMS) to Capnography for Respiratory Rate (RR)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06521385
Enrollment
32
Registered
2024-07-26
Start date
2024-05-17
Completion date
2024-07-02
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Monitoring

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the performance of a novel non-invasive respiratory monitoring system against the gold standard methods (capnography) in human subjects. The main question it aims to answer is whether the novel monitoring system comparable to the current standards.

Interventions

Subjects monitored by the Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System

Sponsors

Makani Science
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Between age of 22-99 * BMI between 15 and 40 kg/m\^2

Exclusion criteria

* Medical history of serious symptomatic, cardiac, or pulmonary disease. * History of serious skin irritation (severe rash or blisters) caused by medical adhesives (tape). * Cannot lay still for one (1) hour. * Cannot give written informed consent. * Unable to follow instructions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Rate Accuracy Compared Between Experimental and Reference Devices1 hourMean absolute error (MAE) was calculated for concurrent respiratory rate measurements obtained from the Makani Science system (experimental device) and capnography (reference device). MAE was defined as the average of the absolute differences between the experimental and reference measurements. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval were also calculated for each MAE. Device performance was considered acceptable if the MAE was within 3 breaths per minute (BPM) of the reference device.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Rate Bias Compared Between Experimental and Reference Devices1 hourBias was calculated for concurrent respiratory rate measurements obtained from the Makani Science system (experimental device) and capnography (reference device). Bias was defined as the average of the differences between the experimental and reference measurements. A negative bias indicates the experimental device underreports the measurement. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval were also calculated for each biase.
Makani Science System Performance After Simulated Breathing Artifacts15 minutesMean absolute error (MAE) and Bias was calculated for concurrent respiratory rate measurements obtained from the Makani Science system (experimental device) and capnography (reference device) after subject performed simulated breathing artifacts. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval were also calculated for each MAE and Bias.
Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying on the Right Side15 minutesMean absolute error (MAE) and biase was calculated for concurrent respiratory rate measurements obtained from the Makani Science system (experimental device) and capnography (reference device) after the subject shifted to their right side. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval were also calculated for each MAE and biase.
Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying on the Left Side15 minutesMean absolute error (MAE) and biase was calculated for concurrent respiratory rate measurements obtained from the Makani Science system (experimental device) and capnography (reference device) after the subject shifted to their left side. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval were also calculated for each MAE and biase.
Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying in the Reclined Position15 minutesMean absolute error (MAE) and biase was calculated for concurrent respiratory rate measurements obtained from the Makani Science system (experimental device) and capnography (reference device) after the subject shifted to the reclined position. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval were also calculated for each MAE and biase.

Countries

United States

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous49.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
Body Mass Index
Normal (BMI < 25)
12 Participants
Body Mass Index
Overweight (BMI >=25)
17 Participants
Height166.4 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
Skin Color
I
3 Fitzpatrick Scale
Skin Color
II
5 Fitzpatrick Scale
Skin Color
III
7 Fitzpatrick Scale
Skin Color
IV
8 Fitzpatrick Scale
Skin Color
V
5 Fitzpatrick Scale
Skin Color
VI
1 Fitzpatrick Scale
Weight72 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 29

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026