Artificial Intelligence, Nursing Education
Conditions
Brief summary
This research was conducted to examine the effect of students' use of AI tools while preparing patient education material on the quality, understandability and actionability of the material in terms of content. Students in the control group used auxiliary tools such as books, journals and websites while preparing patient education materials. Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites.
Detailed description
This research was conducted to examine the effect of students' use of AI tools while preparing patient education material on the quality, understandability and actionability of the material in terms of content. Students in the control group used auxiliary tools such as books, journals and websites while preparing patient education materials. Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and Global Quality Scale were used to evaluate the educational materials.
Interventions
Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* agreeing to participate in the study, * taking the Fundamentals of Nursing II course for the first time, * not working as a nurse in a hospital or any health institution.
Exclusion criteria
* not agreeing to participate in the study * having prepared patient education materials before * repeating the Fundamentals of Nursing II course * not having internet access * not having a computer or smartphone.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Understandability of the material | After the students have completed the materials (5 days later) | Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials: The tool consists of a total of 26 items, 19 items evaluating the understandability of the materials and 7 items evaluating their actionability. PEMAT scores materials from 0 to 100 points for understandability and actionability. |
| Actionability of the material | After the students have completed the materials (5 days later) | Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials: The tool consists of a total of 26 items, 19 items evaluating the understandability of the materials and 7 items evaluating their actionability. PEMAT scores materials from 0 to 100 points for understandability and actionability. |
| Quality of the material | After the students have completed the materials (5 days later) | Global Quality Scale : According to this scale, the quality of the training materials was evaluated on a 5-point scale (1: poor quality, 2: low quality - limited use, 3: somewhat useful, 4: useful, 5: useful-excellent quality). |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)