Skip to content

Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Child Obesity Treatment Using Community Health Workers

Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Child Obesity Treatment Using Community Health Workers: the Role of Parental Bandwidth in Treatment Effectiveness

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06520657
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-07-25
Start date
2025-01-03
Completion date
2027-01-01
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Child Obesity, Social Determinants of Health

Keywords

Community Health Workers, Randomized trial, Pilot Study, Child Obesity Treatment, Executive function

Brief summary

The goal of this small pilot study is to test the feasibility of combining a three-month intervention of working with a community health worker (CHW) to address social risk factors for patients prior to beginning a group weight management program for childhood obesity -- Promoting Health in Teens and Kids (PHIT Kids)

Interventions

OTHERCommunity Health Worker

Participants are screened for social determinants of health and work with a community health worker for three months to connect them with community and government services to address their family's needs.

BEHAVIORALChild weight management intervention

This is a 12-week family-based behavioral group intervention to address childhood overweight and obesity.

OTHERStandard of Care referral to resources

One-time referral to resources based on need that families can access independently either by providing electronic referral to or providing written contact information for a community resource.

Sponsors

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Lead SponsorOTHER
Community Health Council of Wyandotte County
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Kansas Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

60 Families (2 participants in each- parent and child) will be randomized to community health worker intervention or standard social risk factor (SRF) referral for the first 3 months and then 3-6 months both groups will do the same child obesity intervention then 6-12 months both will receive no intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Family must have one major social risk factor on the Protocol for Responding to \& Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks \& Experiences (PRAPARE) of the 14 modifiable risk factors * Child aged 8 through 12 years of age * Child with BMI% at 85th percentile or higher and less than the 120% of the 95th percentile (overweight or class 1 obesity) * Child must live with parent/guardian at least 5 out of the 7 days on average (70% of the time) * Child and parent able to speak English

Exclusion criteria

* Child on medications known to cause ongoing weight gain (e.g., atypical anti-psychotics, chronic prednisone, insulin) * Child on other medications know to affect weight if dose and BMI z-score has not been stable for 3 months. * Diabetes or other disease that has a significant effect on diet, physical activity, or ability to take part in trial activities besides obesity (does not included treated or mild depression or anxiety, limited food allergies or mild physical activity limitations) * For parents: new MI, stroke or cancer diagnosis (excluding localized skin cancers) in past 6 months, history of bariatric surgery within the past 3 years, pregnancy in last 6 months or planned within 1 year * Child or parent has significant developmental or cognitive impairments or other significant medical issue that would interfere with ability to participate or complete assessment * Parent or child has significant physical limitation * Parent/child planning to move to from Children's Mercy Kansas City (CMKC) service area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Child Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-ScoreChange in BMI Z-score over a 6 month time period in the child with obesity or overweight6 months
Inhibitory Control and Attention3 monthsThe Flanker Inhibitory and Control Attention Test (Flanker) measures accuracy and reaction time to produce a combined score ranging from 0-10 with higher scores indicating better inhibitory control and attention.
Working Memory3 monthsThe List Sorting Working Memory Test asks participants to recall a list of foods and animals in order from smallest to largest. Correct responses range from 0-26, and are then converted to nationally normed standard scores ranging from 59-140, with higher scores indicating better working memory.
Cognitive Flexibility3 monthsThe Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (DCCS) measures accuracy and reaction time to produce a combined score ranging from 0-10 with higher scores indicating better cognitive flexibility.
Enrollment Rate1 yearNumber of participants enrolled (consented) per month
Retention6 monthsAttendance at 6 month data assessment
Satisfaction with Community Health Worker (CHW)3 monthsA 15-item scale asks about quality of interactions and satisfaction with their CHW. Scores range from 15 to 60, with higher scores indicating increased satisfaction.
Satisfaction with PHIT Kids - Parent6 monthsA single 10-point Likert scale satisfaction rating about the group weight management intervention. Scores range from 1-10 with higher scores indicating increased satisfaction.
Parent Cognitive Capacity3 monthsThe Raven's 2 Progressive Matrices- Digital Short Form (Raven's 2) tests fluid intelligence by asking participants to identify missing pieces in visual geometric patterns of up to 24 progressively more difficult trials. The total number correct is converted into Standard Scores, which will be compared to a participant's other scores over the course of the study. Standard scores range from 59-140 with higher scores indicating increased cognitive capacity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PHIT Kids attendance6 monthspercent of PHIT Kids sessions attended
Percentage of needs met or partially met3 monthsAt 3 months, participants will review each need identified at baseline and report if they received "All the help I needed," "Most of the help I needed," "A little of the help I needed," or "None of the help I needed." The total number of needs that were at least partially met ("a little", "most" or "all") or that were fully met ("all") will be divided by the total number of needs at baseline
Enrollment in at least one new resource3 monthsYes/No. Family has accessed at 3 months at least one new community or government resource since baseline. Participants will review a list of resources potentially offered to CHW clients and respond whether they currently receive this resource at baseline and 3 months
Number of key measures completed6 monthsNumber of the following measures completed - outcome measures (child BMI-z, parent weight, MVPA (actigraph; at least 4 days), dietary measures (3 recalls)), bandwidth measures (executive functions measures and Raven matrices) and self-efficacy.
Parent Weight6 months and 12 monthsChange in parent weight at 6 month and 12 months
Child Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)6 months and 12 monthsMinutes per week in moderate to vigourous physical activity as measure by an Actigraph waist accelerometer worn by the child. Also percent of time in MVPA
Child Dietary Intake6 months and 12 monthsThree 24 hour recalls completed by parent using the he Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA 24) computer program - used to calculate fruit and vegetable (FV) servings, sugar sweetened beverages, and number of high fat/high sugar foods (foods with \>7g of fat and/or 12g of sugar)
Self-Efficacy6 months10-item, 5-point Likert scale. Measured by the General Self-Efficacy Scale in the NIH Toolbox. This scale assesses an individual's perceived ability to cope with stressful situations. Scores range from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHelena Laroche, MD

Children's Mercy Kansas City

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026