Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization
Conditions
Keywords
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Disease-Specific Chemotherapy, Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, Etoposide, Cytarabine Combined with PEG-rhG-CSF
Brief summary
This study utilizes a prospective, multicenter, randomized two-arm design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) combination therapy (EAP regimen) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A total of 99 NHL patients will be enrolled as research subjects and will be randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to compare the EAP regimen versus disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimen. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×10\^6/kg).
Detailed description
Based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 99 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients from 16 hospitals will be selected. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group will receive the EAP regimen, which combines etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), while the control group will receive disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimens, such as the CHOP and Hyper-CVAD. Subsequently, the number of CD34+ cells will be monitored. The study will evaluate the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×106/kg); the proportion of patients achieving the target collection value cumulatively; the total amount of CD34+ cells collected and the average number of collections; hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions; and the proportion of patients receiving plerixafor.
Interventions
Day 1\ Day 2: 75mg/m\^2
Day 1\ Day 2: 200g/m\^2, q12h
Day 6: 6mg
Starting from the 9th day, if the white blood cell count is less than 20,000/μL, administer G-CSF at a dose of 5μg/kg by subcutaneous injection until the collection is completed.
\[Cyclophosphamide (Cy) + Doxorubicin (ADM) + Vincristine (VDS) + Prednisone (Pred) \]± Rituximab (R)
\[Cyclophosphamide + Doxorubicin + Vincristine + Dexamethasone (DXM)\] ± Rituximab
\[High-Dose Methotrexate (MTX) + Cytarabine\] ± Rituximab
\[Etoposide + Doxorubicin + Vincristine + Cyclophosphamide + Prednisone\] ± Rituximab
\[Gemcitabine (G) + Cisplatin (P) + Dexamethasone (DXM)\] ± Rituximab
\[Gemcitabine + Cisplatin + Dexamethasone + Etoposide\] ± Rituximab
\[Etoposide + Ifosfamide (IFO) + Carboplatin\] ± Rituximab
\[Dexamethasone + Ifosfamide + Ifosfamide + Etoposide\] ± Rituximab
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Prospective, randomized, two-arm, multicenter, exploratory study
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma before enrollment. * Indication for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0\ 1. * Achieved complete remission after multiple courses of chemotherapy. * Life expectancy ≥ 3 months. * Subjects must be able to understand the protocol and sign the informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Cardiac function class II or higher or cardiac ejection fraction \< 40%. * Serum direct bilirubin (DBIL) more than twice of the upper limit of normal (ULN). * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) more than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN). * Serum creatinine clearance rate ≤ 50%. * Patients with active infection. * History of prior hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| % of patients achieving the collection of ≥5×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg | 1 month | Proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value (CD34+ cells ≥5×10\^6/kg) after a single collection. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| % of patients achieving the collection of ≥2×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg | 1 month | To observe and compare the proportion of patients who cumulatively achieve the target collection value (CD34+ cells ≥ 2×10\^6/kg) between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen; the proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value. |
| CD34+ cells and the average number of collections | 1 month | To observe and compare the total cumulative collection of CD34+ cells and the average number of collections between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. |
| Adverse Rvents (AEs) | 1 month | To observe and compare the hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. |
| % of patients who use Plerixafor | 1 month | To observe and compare the proportion of patients who receive plerixafor added to the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. |
Countries
China