Skip to content

Comparison Study of EAP and Disease-Specific Chemotherapy Regimens in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization for Lymphoma

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Etoposide, Cytarabine, and PEG-rhG-CSF Combination Therapy vs. Disease-Specific Chemotherapy for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Lymphoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06520163
Enrollment
99
Registered
2024-07-25
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2025-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization

Keywords

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Disease-Specific Chemotherapy, Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, Etoposide, Cytarabine Combined with PEG-rhG-CSF

Brief summary

This study utilizes a prospective, multicenter, randomized two-arm design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) combination therapy (EAP regimen) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A total of 99 NHL patients will be enrolled as research subjects and will be randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to compare the EAP regimen versus disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimen. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×10\^6/kg).

Detailed description

Based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 99 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients from 16 hospitals will be selected. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group will receive the EAP regimen, which combines etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), while the control group will receive disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimens, such as the CHOP and Hyper-CVAD. Subsequently, the number of CD34+ cells will be monitored. The study will evaluate the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×106/kg); the proportion of patients achieving the target collection value cumulatively; the total amount of CD34+ cells collected and the average number of collections; hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions; and the proportion of patients receiving plerixafor.

Interventions

DRUGEtoposide

Day 1\ Day 2: 75mg/m\^2

DRUGCytarabine

Day 1\ Day 2: 200g/m\^2, q12h

DRUGPEG-rhG-CSF

Day 6: 6mg

DRUGG-CSF

Starting from the 9th day, if the white blood cell count is less than 20,000/μL, administer G-CSF at a dose of 5μg/kg by subcutaneous injection until the collection is completed.

COMBINATION_PRODUCTCHOP

\[Cyclophosphamide (Cy) + Doxorubicin (ADM) + Vincristine (VDS) + Prednisone (Pred) \]± Rituximab (R)

COMBINATION_PRODUCTHyper-CVAD

\[Cyclophosphamide + Doxorubicin + Vincristine + Dexamethasone (DXM)\] ± Rituximab

COMBINATION_PRODUCTID-MTX + Ara-C

\[High-Dose Methotrexate (MTX) + Cytarabine\] ± Rituximab

COMBINATION_PRODUCTDA-EPOCH

\[Etoposide + Doxorubicin + Vincristine + Cyclophosphamide + Prednisone\] ± Rituximab

COMBINATION_PRODUCTGDP

\[Gemcitabine (G) + Cisplatin (P) + Dexamethasone (DXM)\] ± Rituximab

COMBINATION_PRODUCTGDPE

\[Gemcitabine + Cisplatin + Dexamethasone + Etoposide\] ± Rituximab

COMBINATION_PRODUCTICE

\[Etoposide + Ifosfamide (IFO) + Carboplatin\] ± Rituximab

COMBINATION_PRODUCTDICE

\[Dexamethasone + Ifosfamide + Ifosfamide + Etoposide\] ± Rituximab

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Jinhua People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Central Hospital of Lishui City
CollaboratorOTHER
Shaoxing People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shaoxing Second Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhejiang Provincial Tongde Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Taizhou Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Dongyang People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University
CollaboratorOTHER
Huzhou Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomized, two-arm, multicenter, exploratory study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma before enrollment. * Indication for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0\ 1. * Achieved complete remission after multiple courses of chemotherapy. * Life expectancy ≥ 3 months. * Subjects must be able to understand the protocol and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiac function class II or higher or cardiac ejection fraction \< 40%. * Serum direct bilirubin (DBIL) more than twice of the upper limit of normal (ULN). * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) more than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN). * Serum creatinine clearance rate ≤ 50%. * Patients with active infection. * History of prior hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% of patients achieving the collection of ≥5×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg1 monthProportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value (CD34+ cells ≥5×10\^6/kg) after a single collection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% of patients achieving the collection of ≥2×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg1 monthTo observe and compare the proportion of patients who cumulatively achieve the target collection value (CD34+ cells ≥ 2×10\^6/kg) between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen; the proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value.
CD34+ cells and the average number of collections1 monthTo observe and compare the total cumulative collection of CD34+ cells and the average number of collections between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.
Adverse Rvents (AEs)1 monthTo observe and compare the hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions between the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.
% of patients who use Plerixafor1 monthTo observe and compare the proportion of patients who receive plerixafor added to the EAP regimen and the disease-specific chemotherapy regimen.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactPeipei Ye
39612903@qq.com86-13685832706
Backup ContactYing Lu
814871416@qq.com86-13486090834

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026