Skip to content

Robotics as a Useful Tool to Improve the Hydration of the Elderly

Robotics as a Useful Tool to Improve the Hydration of the Elderly

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06520033
Acronym
Hidroponent
Enrollment
57
Registered
2024-07-25
Start date
2024-05-08
Completion date
2024-09-06
Last updated
2025-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Daily Fluid Intake, Dehydration, Urinary Infections

Keywords

dehydration, aged, nursing homes, robotics, fluid intake

Brief summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a hydration educational program executed through a robot in comparison with the usual hydration program in terms of fluid intake and general health status of the residents. The main question to be answered is whether the use of robotics through a humanoid robot increases the hydration of institutionalized older people. Participants: * The intervention group will receive a hydration plan executed by the robot and the control group will receive the center's usual hydration plan. * Healthcare personnel will receive reminders from the robot to record fluid intake through it. In the control group, health personnel will perform the fluid intake record in paper format and at the end of the shift, as usual.

Interventions

DEVICEhumanoid robot

The humanoid robot will execute an educational hydration plan that will be integrated into the usual dynamics of the residence. In order to increase the fluid intake of the residents, stimulation activities will be proposed that will be carried out by the robot such as reminders, interactive activities and positive reinforcement. It will also allow the daily recording fluid intake of each residents. This intervention will last two months.

OTHERUsual care

The center's usual hydration plan

Sponsors

Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (Catalonia, Spain)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Universitari Santa Maria (Lleida, Spain)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitat de Lleida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age equal to or greater than 65 years. No

Exclusion criteria

have been established.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily fluid intakeFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 8 weeksAmount in milliliters (ml)
Blood Urea Nitrogen8 weeksBUN = Urea/2.1428. Dehydration \> 20mg/dl
Serum osmolarity8 weeksSerum osmolarity: \[1,86\*(Na+K)+1,15\*Glucose+urea+14)\]. Dehydration \> 300mOsm/kg
Urine color8 weeksUrine color chart (Armstrong, 2000). Values = 1 - 8. Dehydration: scores \>= 4
Number of urinary infections8 weeksObtained through a urine sample and evaluated with the Combur-Test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacological treatment8 weeksNumber of medicines taken by the participant per day and type of medicine.
Nutritional status8 weeksAssessed through the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). Values = 0 - 30. Malnutrition: scores \< 17
Risk of pressure ulcers8 weeksBraden Scale. Values = 6 - 23. Risk of pressure ulcers: scores \< 19
Functional status8 weeksBarthel index. Values = 0 - 100. Functional impairment: scores \< 90
Hospital admissions8 weeksNumber of hospital admissions
Efficacy and safety of swallowing8 weeksVolume-Viscosity swallow test (V-VST): identify clinical signs of impaired efficacy (labial seal, oral and pharyngeal residue, and piecemeal deglutition) and impaired safety of swallow (voice changes, cough and decrease in oxygen saturation ≥3%). It starts with nectar viscosity and increasing bolus volume, then liquid and finally pudding viscosity
Dry Skin8 weeksSkin turgor: if skin remains elevated after being pulled up and released
Cognitive status8 weeksThe Mini Cognitive Examination (MEC) (Values = 0 - 30). Cognitive impairment: scores \<= 23
Risk of falls8 weeksDownton scale. Values = 0 - 11. Risk of falls: scores \> 2
Illnesses8 weeksDiseases that the participant currently presents

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Education levelBaselineChoose between: no studies, primary studies, secondary studies and university studies.
SexBaselineFemale or male sex
Date of institutionalizationBaselineDate in yyyy/mm/dd format when the resident began to be institutionalized in the center.
Marital statusBaselineThe answer options are: single, married, in partnership (but not married), separated or divorced (currently without a partner), widow (If the answer is yesmust be specified if less than one year or not).
BirthdateBaselineDate of birth in yyyy/mm/dd format

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026