Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin Versus Etoricoxib for Acute Low Back Pain

Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin Versus Etoricoxib in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06517823
Enrollment
190
Registered
2024-07-24
Start date
2024-04-26
Completion date
2024-10-11
Last updated
2024-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Low-back Pain

Keywords

Acute Low -back Pain, Acute pain, Etoricoxib, Cyanocobalamin

Brief summary

Phase III longitudinal, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin Versus Etoricoxib in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain

Detailed description

Researchers will compare the fixed-dose combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin versus Etoricoxib in acute low back pain by comparing the proportion of patients that reported an improvement in pain during the 7 days of follow up. The adverse events related to the interventions will be registered during follow up. Participants will: * Be randomized into one of the 2 intervention groups (A or B) * Visit the clinic in 3 occasions (day 0, day 3 of follow up and day 7 of follow up) * In case needed the patient could take 50 mg of tramadol, as a rescue medication, previous authorization of de principal investigator

Interventions

One pill of 90 mg a day

DRUGEtoricoxib + Cyanocobalamin fixed dose

One tablet of 90 mg / 0.50 mg a day

Sponsors

Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Agree to participate in the study and give written informed consent * Patient with pain reported as moderate to severe intensity with ≥ 40 mm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). * At least 4 points on the Douleur Neuropathique-4 items (DN-4) scale. * Diagnosis of acute low back pain as a first-time episode or a previous episode 6 months before the enrollment day and lasting no more than 6 weeks. * Women of childbearing potential under a medically acceptable method of contraception

Exclusion criteria

* Patients participating in another clinical trial involving an investigational treatment or participation in one within 4 weeks prior to study start * Patients in whom the participation in the study may be influenced (employment relationship with the research site or sponsor, inmates, etc.) * At medical discretion, a disease that affects prognosis and prevents outpatient management, for example, but not limited to: end-stage cancer, kidney, heart, respiratory or liver failure, mental illness or with scheduled surgical or hospital procedures * History/presence of any disease or condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could pose a risk for the patient or confusing the efficacy and safety of the investigational product * Patients in whom the study drug is contraindicated for medical reasons * Patients with allergy or hypersensitivity to the active substance of the study drugs, related products or excipients (Etoricoxib of Cyanocobalamin) * Pregnant women, women breastfeeding or planning a pregnancy during the conducting the study * Significant history of gastrointestinal diseases (e.g., gastric ulcer, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative Colitis, etc.) * Active opioid and/or NSAID treatment including COX-2 inhibitors, reported in the medical record within the last 72 hours of study entry. * Patients with a history of congestive heart failure: NYHA II-IV. * Concomitant use of strong CYP1A2 inhibitors (e.g., fluvoxamine, ciprofloxacin, etc.). * Patients with a history of alcohol or drug abuse in the last year * Patients with a history of ischemic heart disease, peripheral artery disease, and/or cerebral vascular disease (including patients who have recently undergone coronary revascularization or angioplasty) * Patients with a history of seizures, epileptic status and/or grand mal seizures * History of chronic liver failure Child-Pugh A, B, and/or C * History of acute renal failure (glomerular filtration rate \<30 ml/min/1.72 m2) * Patient with a history of chronic pain associated with fibromyalgia, Paget's disease or bone pain induced by metastatic cancer * Low back pain due to a history of major trauma in the past 12 months (e.g., vertebral fracture, post-traumatic spondylolisthesis) or due to a visceral disorder (e.g., dysmenorrhea, history of endometriosis). * Patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection (fever, cough, dyspnea) and/or contact in the last 14 days with a suspected or positive patient for COVID-19

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the proportion of patients reporting pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity with a VAS ≤20 mm) at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days of follow-up, according to their baseline measurement in each treatment group7 dyasThe visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the change porcentage will be measured and compared between treatment groups. The patient will visit the clinic at days 0,3 and 7. The researcher will call the patient for follow up at days 1 and 5.
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events through the patient's diary record.7 dyasTo describe the frequency, intensity and causality of the adverse events presented during the clinical trial by treatment group. The adverse events will be registered by the patient in the diary record. Each adverse event will be followed up at the discretion of the researcher.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analyze the percentage change in pain intensity based on VAS score at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.7 days% change= ((Final Measurement-Initial Measurement)/(Initial Measurement))\*100
Comparison of the proportion of subjects with pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity) through VAS, ≥ 30% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.7 daysThe visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. The proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain \>30% will be reported and compared between treatment groups at days 1,3,5 and 7.
Comparison of the proportion of subjects with pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity) through VAS, ≥ 50% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.7 daysThe visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. The proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain \>30% will be reported and compared between treatment groups at days 1,3,5 and 7.
Assess and compare the degree of disability to perform daily activities due to low back pain, reported through Roland-Morris questionnaire at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.7 daysThe Roland-Morris questionnaire has been designed to assess the activities of daily living functional mobility pain. A maximum score of 24 indicates the greatest degree of disability from pain. The disability degree will be compared.
Assess changes in the score on the Douleur Neuropathique-4 items scale (DN-4) at days 3 and 7 in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.7 daysThe DN4 is a clinician-administered, neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire, consisting of ten items grouped in four sections. The first seven items are related to the quality of pain (burning, painful cold, electric shocks) and its association to abnormal sensations (tingling, pins and needles, numbness, itching). The other three items are related to neurological examination in the painful area (touch hypoesthesia, pinprick hypoesthesia, tactile allodynia).
Report the number of patients who present therapeutic failure during the study among the treatment groups7 daysTherapeutic failure will be defined by the principal researcher previous medical consult, the following criteria must be present: \- When there is a decrease \<10 mm or increase in VAS values compared to baseline and a ≥ 80% adherence to treatment
Assess and compare the degree of physical disability due to acute low back pain, measured through the Oswestry disability questionnaire at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.7 daysThe Oswestry questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back pain has affected the ability to manage everyday life of patients, it classifies QOL as: no disability, mild disability, moderate disability, severe disability and completely disabled. The disability degree would be compared.
Analyze the average change in pain intensity according to VAS score at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement.7 daysThe visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the change porcentage will be measured and compared between treatment groups. The patient will visit the clinic at days 0,3 and 7. The researcher will call the patient for follow up at days 1 and 5.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
To report the percentage of therapeutic adherence at day 7 of the intervention in each treatment group.7 daysTherapeutic adherence will be defined by the principal researcher. Adherence to treatment will be defined as a consumption ≥ 80% of the doses that the patient should have ingested at the time of the corresponding evaluation.
Report the number of patients who require the use of rescue medication during the clinical trial in each treatment group7 daysThe rescue medication will be tramadol 50 mg: \- The patient that considers the need for rescue medication must call the doctor, who will be in charge of applying the VAS scale by telephone. If the doctor considers it necessary, the taking of the rescue medication will be indicated.

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026