Skip to content

Omitting of Lymphadenectomy is Acceptable for Lung Cancer Smaller Than 6 mm in Solid Size

Omitting of Lymphadenectomy is Acceptable for Lung Cancer Smaller Than 6 mm in Solid Size

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06516796
Enrollment
2713
Registered
2024-07-24
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2024-02-01
Last updated
2024-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Sublobar resection, Non-small cell lung cancer, No lymphadenectomy, Solid size

Brief summary

Many studies suggested that selective lymph node sampling was acceptable for specific non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of omitting of lymphadenectomy for selected NSCLC. Patients with small-sized (≤2 cm) NSCLC who underwent surgical resection between 2009 and 2022 were retrospectively screened.

Detailed description

Many studies suggested that selective lymph node sampling was acceptable for specific non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of omitting of lymphadenectomy for selected NSCLC. Patients with small-sized (≤2 cm) NSCLC who underwent surgical resection between 2009 and 2022 were retrospectively screened. The characteristics of patients with nodal metastasis were demonstrated. For selected patients, the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with and without lymphadenectomy were compared. Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were adopted for prognostic evaluation. A total of 2713 NSCLC patients were enrolled, and 75 of them (2.76%) had nodal involvement. None of patients with pure ground glass opacity (0/945) had nodal metastasis, while 14 patients with part-solid (14/1260, 1.11%) and 61 patients with solid nodules (61/508, 12.01%) had nodal involvement. Patients with nodal metastasis had a minimum solid size of 6 mm. NSCLC with solid components \< 6 mm (n=1588) had no nodal metastasis. Of them, 339 patients underwent sublobar resection without lymphadenectomy (SRN0), 1056 subjects received sublobar resection with lymphadenectomy (SRN1), and 190 patients received lobectomy plus lymphadenectomy (LRN1). Patients with SRN0 had a shorter operating time, less volume of drainage, a lower incidence of chylothorax (0 vs. 0.6% vs. 2.1%, P=0.012) and air leakage, as well as a shorter postoperative hospitalization (3 vs. 4 vs. 4 days, P\<0.001) than those with SRN1 or LRN1. During a median follow-up of 61 months, no patient with SRN0 was dead or tumor recurrent. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 100%, 99.2% and 98.5% for patients with SRN0, SRN1 and LRN1, respectively (P=0.370).

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

Patients were retrospectively screened.

Sponsors

Liang Chen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) * the maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm * receiving surgical treatment between 2009-2022

Exclusion criteria

* non-primary NSCLC; * with small cell lung cancer components; * undergoing preoperative neoadjuvant therapies; * with compromised resection; * malignant tumor history over the past five years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival (OS)OS was defined from the surgical date to the date of death or the date of the last follow-up, whichever came first, assessed up to 14 years.OS was defined from the surgical date to the date of death or the date of the last follow-up. defined from the surgical date to the date of death or the date of the last follow-up.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026