Skip to content

Efficacy of Risk-Stratified Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Infant Leukemia

Efficacy of Risk-Stratified Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Infant Leukemia: A Multicenter, Prospective Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06516679
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-07-24
Start date
2024-12-11
Completion date
2032-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Lymphoid

Brief summary

This clinical trial is an open-label, multicenter, prospective phase 2 clinical trial targeting pediatric leukemia patients of infant age. The goal is to improve survival rates by varying the presence or absence of chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation based on genetic characteristics at the time of diagnosis and minimal residual disease (MRD) values measured by various methods after treatment. In addition, by clearly defining the patient group that requires hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, it is expected that the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in infantile leukemia, for which there have been various guidelines for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, can be confirmed. Additionally, due to the characteristics of infants, this study aim to identify long-term sequelae or prognosis related to treatment by prospectively collecting side effect data related to treatment during and after treatment.

Detailed description

Infant leukemia patients are classified into low/intermediate/high risk groups and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is performed after chemotherapy or chemotherapy as shown in the schema below. * Low risk group : Induction chemotherapy-Low Risk Consolidation chemotherapy 1\ 4 - Maintenance chemotherapy * Intermediate risk group : Induction chemotherapy-High Risk Consolidation chemotherapy 1\ 4 - Maintenance chemotherapy * High risk group : Induction chemotherapy-High Risk Consolidation chemotherapy 1\ 4 - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Interventions

DRUGConsolidation #4(without daunorubicin)

1. Induction chemotherapy(5wks) : Prednisolone, Dexamethasone, Vincristine, Daunorubicin, L-asparaginase, Cytarabine, intrathecal cytarabine, intrathecal methotrexate 2. Low Risk Cosolidation 1 chemotherapy(3wks) : Cytarabine, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, intrathecal methotrexate 3. Low Risk Cosolidation 2 chemotherapy(3wks) : Methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine, intrathecal methotrexate 4. Low Risk Cosolidation 3 chemotherapy(3wks) : Cytarabine, L-asparaginase, intrathecal methotrexate 5. Low Risk Cosolidation 3 chemotherapy(8wks) : Dexamethasone, Vincristine, Daunorubicin, Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, intrathecal methotrexate 6. Maintenance chemotherapy(about 2yrs) : Vincristine, Dexamethasone, 6-mercaptopurine, intrathecal methotrexate

DRUGConsolidation #4(with daunorubicin)

1. Induction chemotherapy(5wks) : Prednisolone, Dexamethasone, Vincristine, Daunorubicin, L-asparaginase, Cytarabine, intrathecal cytarabine, intrathecal methotrexate 2. High Risk Cosolidation 1 chemotherapy(3wks) : Cytarabine, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin intrathecal methotrexate 3. High Risk Cosolidation 2 chemotherapy(3wks) : Methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine, intrathecal methotrexate 4. High Risk Cosolidation 3 chemotherapy(3wks) : Cytarabine, L-asparaginase, intrathecal methotrexate 5. High Risk Cosolidation 3 chemotherapy(8wks) : Dexamethasone, Vincristine, Daunorubicin, Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, intrathecal methotrexate 6. Maintenance chemotherapy(about 2yrs) : Vincristine, Dexamethasone, 6-mercaptopurine, intrathecal methotrexate

DRUGAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after Consolidation #4(with daunorubicin)

1. Induction chemotherapy(5wks) : Prednisolone, Dexamethasone, Vincristine, Daunorubicin, L-asparaginase, Cytarabine, intrathecal cytarabine, intrathecal methotrexate 2. High Risk Cosolidation 1 chemotherapy(3wks) : Cytarabine, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin intrathecal methotrexate 3. High Risk Cosolidation 2 chemotherapy(3wks) : Methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine, intrathecal methotrexate 4. High Risk Cosolidation 3 chemotherapy(3wks) : Cytarabine, L-asparaginase, intrathecal methotrexate 5. High Risk Cosolidation 3 chemotherapy(8wks) : Dexamethasone, Vincristine, Daunorubicin, Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, intrathecal methotrexate 6. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

* Low risk group : KMT2A wild type & minimal residual disease(MRD) (-) after consolidation 1 * Intermediate risk group : Intermediate risk (If one of the two cases below applies) * KMT2A: MLL mutation (+) & minimal residual disease (MRD) (-) after consolidation 1 * KMT2A: wild type & minimal residual disease (MRD) (+) after consolidation 1 * High risk group : Somatic KMT2A mutation (+) & minimal residual disease (MRD) (+) after consolidation 1

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 2 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The age of diagnosis is less than 1 year old * The disgnosisi of ALL or ALAL(lymphoid predominant) * Informed consent of the parents(guardians) before participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

* Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma or mature B-cell leukemia * Down syndrome, Bloom syndrome, ataxia-telangiectasia, Fanconi anemia, Kostmann syndrome, Shwachman syndrome or other bone marrow failure syndrome, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation * Relapsed infant leukemia * Participants with contraindication to medication * Administered systemic steroid therapy within 4 weeks prior to this study (However, steroid administration is allowable in oncologic emergencies only after the subject's disease diagnosis and risk group classification are completed.) * Participants in other interventional studies other than this protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3-years Overall survival(OS) rate3-yearsThe 3-years overall survival rate defined as the percentage of subject in a treatment group who are alive three years after the start of treatm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival (OS)Up to 5yearsThe overall survival rate defined as the percentage of subject in a treatment group who are alive five years after the start of treatment.
Event Free Survial(EFS)3-years and 5-yearsEFS is defined as the period from study enrollment until disease progression, including hematological recurrence of ALL, development of secondary malignancy, or death from any causes, whichever occurs earlier.
The rate of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients by risk groupUp to 5yearsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year
recurred rateUp to 5yearsAs a the period from enrollment to disease progression/recurrence
Death rate related to infusionUp to 5yearsThe time until defined by date of drug-related mortality from the date of 1st infusion

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 30, 2026