Skip to content

Texture and Colour Enhancement Imaging in Improving Detection and Miss Rate of Premalignant Lesions

Impact of Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging on Detection and Miss Rate of Premalignant Lesions: A Multicentre, Randomized, Tandem Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06515977
Enrollment
2964
Registered
2024-07-23
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2025-08-01
Last updated
2024-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenoma, Sessile Serrated Adenoma

Keywords

texture and color enhancement imaging, colonoscopy, adenoma detection rate, sessile serrated lesion detection rate, adenoma miss rate, sessile serrated lesion miss rate

Brief summary

Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging (TXI) is a newly developed image-enhancing endoscopy technology that has show potential in improving detection of colorectal lesions. This multicenter, randomized, tandem trial is aimed at evaluating whether TXI is superior to WLI endoscopy in terms of diagnosis of premalignant lesions.

Interventions

PROCEDURETXI (Group A)

Patients in Group A will undergo colonoscopy with TXI.

PROCEDURETXI followed by WLI (Group B)

Patients in group B will first undergo colonoscopy with TXI and every polyp found should be removed. Then switch to WLI for a second withdrawal to detect lesions that were not observed the first time.

PROCEDUREWLI (Group C)

Patients in Group C will undergo colonoscopy with WLI.

PROCEDUREWLI followed by TXI (Group D)

Patients in group D will first undergo colonoscopy with WLI and every polyp found should be removed. Then switch to TXI for a second withdrawal to detect lesions that were not observed the first time.

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Huadong Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
The General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command
CollaboratorOTHER
Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
CollaboratorOTHER
Wenzhou Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanxi Coal Center Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dalian Municipal Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seventh Medical Center of PLA Army General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zunyi Medical College
CollaboratorOTHER
Shandong Second People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu
CollaboratorOTHER
Lanzhou University Second Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Third People's Hospital of Jingdezhen
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fudan University Attached Tumor Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Qingyuan People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Changhai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

patients aged 45-85 years and scheduled for screening colonoscopy who provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Surveillance, diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy Patients with an already known or suspected colorectal tumour Patients with alarming symptoms and signs, including haematochezia, melena, weight loss or anaemia without specific causes, an abdominal mass and positive digital rectal examination Pregnant or lactating women Patients with gastrointestinal tract obstruction Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, hereditary CRC syndromes or serrated polyposis syndrome Patients with abnormal blood coagulation or taking antiplatelets or anticoagulants within 7 days before colonoscopy Patients with failed cecal intubation Patients with poor bowel preparation quality that necessitated a second bowel preparation Patients with a history of colonic resection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
adenoma detection rate1 yearsthe number of patients with one or more adenomas detected and removed divided by the total number of patient
sessile serrated lesion detection rate1 yearsthe number of patients with one or more sessile serrated lesions detected and removed divided by the total number of patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
adenoma miss rate1 yearsthe number of adenomas detected during the second examination divided by the total number of adenomas detected during the first and second colonoscopy
sessile serrated lesion miss rate1 yearsthe number of sessile serrated lesions detected during the second examination divided by the total number of sessile serrated lesions detected during the first and second colonoscopy

Contacts

Primary ContactZhaoshen Li, MD
li.zhaoshen@hotmail.com86-021-31161365
Backup ContactYu Bai, MD
baiyu1998@hotmail.com86-021-31161335

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026