Skip to content

Classic vs. High-Fat Intermittent Fasting Effects

Classic vs. High-Fat Intermittent Fasting: Impacts on Body Composition, Eating Behavior, and Diet Satisfaction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06515639
Enrollment
44
Registered
2024-07-23
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2024-05-15
Last updated
2024-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Intermittent fasting diet, body composition, eating behavior, diet satisfaction

Brief summary

Poor eating habits contribute to weight gain and obesity, leading to numerous metabolic issues such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. The treatment of obesity involves lifestyle interventions that include dietary and nutritional modifications, physical activity, and behavioral therapy. Literature supports both carbohydrate and fat restriction in the treatment of obesity. In low-carbohydrate diets, less than 40% of energy is sourced from carbohydrates.Besides the dietary model, individual eating behavior can also influence the diet's outcomes. There is a significant relationship between eating behavior and food choices. Given that food choices can impact diet satisfaction, evaluating eating behavior is important when assessing dietary compliance.The literature includes studies demonstrating the effects of a classic intermittent fasting diet. However, no studies have compared the potential effects of intermittent fasting models based on the macronutrient distribution within their content. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effects of high-fat, low-carbohydrate intermittent fasting versus classical intermittent fasting on body composition, eating behavior, and diet satisfaction.

Interventions

OTHERDiet therapy for Classic IF diet group

The 16:8 intermittent fasting model was applied for six weeks. Time restrictions were tailored to fit the participants' lifestyles, with feeding times set between 10:00-12:00 and 18:00-20:00 for all participants. The classic intermittent fasting diet was planned with a macronutrient distribution of 45-60% carbohydrates, 10-15% protein, and 25-30% fat. Additionally, total energy intake was reduced by 500-750 kcal.

OTHERDiet therapy for low carb-High fat IF diet group

The 16:8 intermittent fasting model was applied for six weeks. Time restrictions were tailored to fit the participants' lifestyles, with feeding times set between 10:00-12:00 and 18:00-20:00 for all participants.The low carb-high fat intermittent fasting diet included 10-30% carbohydrates and 50-65% fat.Additionally, total energy intake was reduced by 500-750 kcal.

Sponsors

Istanbul Bilgi University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18-65 years old * no chronic disease * female * volunteering

Exclusion criteria

* hypoglycemia * eating disorders * pregnant and lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body compositionsix weeksmeasurements of total body weight
diet satisfactionsix weeksA number of questions are necessary for clinicians to evaluate their patients' or clients' diet satisfaction, as well as their compliance with the diet, based on their responses. The Diet Satisfaction Scale is designed to assess satisfaction with various aspects of any diet, such as hunger levels, desire to eat, food preparation, enjoyment, ease of adherence at home and away, food variety, budget compatibility, contribution to physical health, and sustainability. The scale was developed by Jospe et al, and its Turkish validity and reliability were established by Eskici and Yilmaz. It consists of 9 items with 5-point Likert-type response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Notably, the first item is reverse-scored (1=5, 2=4, 3=3, 4=2, and 5=1).
behavioral and cognitive components of eatingsix weeksThe Three-Factor Eating Scale, used to measure the behavioral and cognitive components of eating, was developed by Cappelleri and colleagues. Its validity and reliability in Turkish were established by Karakus et al. The questionnaire comprises three factors: Uncontrolled Eating (UE), Cognitive Restraint (CR), and Emotional Eating (EE). Uncontrolled Eating (UE) refers to losing control over eating due to hunger or external stimuli and includes 9 items, with scores ranging from 9 to 36. Cognitive Restraint (CR) refers to the conscious restriction of food intake to control body shape and weight, encompassing 6 items, with scores ranging from 6 to 24. Emotional Eating (EE) examines overeating in response to negative emotional states such as anger, sadness, or stress, and includes 6 items, with scores ranging from 6 to 24. A higher score in any sub-factor indicates a greater dominance of the corresponding eating behavior.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026