Skip to content

NeuroTrainer Cognitive Training For Academic Focus

A Feasibility and Efficacy Study of NeuroTrainer Cognitive Training in Students With and Without Attention-Related Difficulties

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06512974
Enrollment
155
Registered
2024-07-22
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2026-02-28
Last updated
2025-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ADHD - Combined Type, ADHD, Predominantly Hyperactive - Impulsive, ADHD Predominantly Inattentive Type

Brief summary

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of NeuroTrainer cognitive training in improving attentional and executive control functions in students with and without attention-related difficulties.

Detailed description

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the feasibility and efficacy of NeuroTrainer cognitive training in improving attentional and executive control function in students with and without attention-related difficulties. The main questions it aims to answer are (1) does NeuroTrainer improve attentional and executive control function, (2) does NeuroTrainer engage the target of ADHD inattention symptoms by identifying the target and demonstrating proximal changes in it, and (3) does NeuroTrainer demonstrate transfer of skill with improvement in academic behaviors. Researchers will compare students who use NeuroTrainer to a control condition to see if the NeuroTrainer intervention produces significant improvements. Participants in the intervention group will engage in virtual reality (VR) sessions which include physical activity and cognitive training. Cognitive training will maximize time at performance thresholds and optimize for variability in task dynamics and demands.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNeuroTrainer

Virtual reality based cognitive training

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of California, Davis
CollaboratorOTHER
NeuroTrainer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This study will evaluate the efficacy of NeuroTrainer cognitive training for improving attention and executive function in students with ADHD and sub threshold ADHD, divided into intervention and control groups. Participants, aged 11-17, will be randomly assigned to use NeuroTrainer or receive standard educational activity. Primary outcomes include attention and executive function improvements, while secondary outcomes assess ADHD symptoms and academic performance. Data will be collected at baseline, midpoint, post-intervention and 6-month follow-up.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnostic criteria met ADHD for any ADHD presentation type, with severity ratings of subthreshold, moderate or severe * Estimated IQ of 80 or greater * Between 11-17 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of suicidality * Presence of psychotic disorders * Visual or hearing impairment * Presence of severe depression

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed TestWeek 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This is an assessment of processing speed. Participants are asked to quickly determine whether two stimuli are the same or not the same. The test takes approximately 4 minutes to complete.
NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (RT)Week 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This test aims to measure an individual's capacity to switch between multiple aspects of a strategy or task. The test takes approximately 4 minutes to complete. This is the response time (RT) outcome from this assessment.
NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (IIV-RT)Week 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This test aims to measure an individual's capacity to switch between multiple aspects of a strategy or task. The test takes approximately 4 minutes to complete. This is the intraindividual variability of RT (IIV-RT) outcome from this assessment.
NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory TestWeek 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This test serves as an evaluation of an individual's working memory capabilities. Participants will be presented with different stimuli visually and audibly, and they will be asked to recall and sequence them accordingly. The test takes approximately 7 minutes to complete.
NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (RT)Week 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This test is designed to evaluate an individual's ability to concentrate their attention while inhibiting automatic response tendencies that could potentially hinder goal achievement. The assessment has demonstrated changes in ADHD cases (Buzy, et al., 2009) and may be sensitive to treatment effects (Epstein et al., 2011). The test will take approximately 3 minutes to complete. This is the reaction time (RT) outcome from this assessment.
NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (IIV-RT)Week 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This test is designed to evaluate an individual's ability to concentrate their attention while inhibiting automatic response tendencies that could potentially hinder goal achievement. The assessment has demonstrated changes in ADHD cases (Buzy, et al., 2009) and may be sensitive to treatment effects (Epstein et al., 2011). The test will take approximately 3 minutes to complete. This is the intraindividual variability of RT (IIV-RT) outcome from this assessment.
NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (% Correct)Week 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This test is designed to evaluate an individual's ability to concentrate their attention while inhibiting automatic response tendencies that could potentially hinder goal achievement. The assessment has demonstrated changes in ADHD cases (Buzy, et al., 2009) and may be sensitive to treatment effects (Epstein et al., 2011). The test will take approximately 3 minutes to complete. This is the percent correct outcome from this assessment.
NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (% Correct)Week 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This test aims to measure an individual's capacity to switch between multiple aspects of a strategy or task. The test takes approximately 4 minutes to complete. This is the percent correct outcome from this assessment.
NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (Omissions)Week 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9This test aims to measure an individual's capacity to switch between multiple aspects of a strategy or task. The test takes approximately 4 minutes to complete. This is the omissions outcome from this assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD:RS-5) - Impulsivity/Hyperactivity SubscaleWeek 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9The investigators will assess the symptoms of ADHD by utilizing the parent and teacher ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD:RS-5) Impulsivity/Hyperactivity Subscale, using two academic teachers and one parent for each participant. This 9-item subscale is specifically designed to evaluate the core ADHD symptoms of Impulsivity/Hyperactivity. By incorporating the perspectives of both teachers and parents, the investigators aim to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the participants' ADHD symptoms across settings. ADHD:RS-5: will be completed by prior school year teachers if the student has been in the class for less than 2 months. Higher scores represent a higher frequency of symptoms and this a worse outcome. For each item, 0 is the minimum and 3 is the maximum value.
Academic Performance Rating Scale (APRS)Week 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9The 19-item Academic Performance Rating Scale (APRS; DuPaul et al.,1991) evaluates student academic performance and is ecologically valid due to (1) assessing in real classroom environments, mirroring academic challenges and behaviors, (2) evaluated by teachers who gain insights into students' academic performance beyond standard tests, and (3) encompassing aspects of academic abilities including behavior, productivity, and work accuracy. This scale has a high test-retest reliability (2-week test-retest=.93-.95; α=.94-.95). Higher scores indicate better academic functioning and impulse control in school. For each item, 1 is the minimum and 5 is the maximum value.
ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD:RS-5) - Inattention SubscaleWeek 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 9The investigators will assess the symptoms of ADHD by utilizing the parent and teacher ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD:RS-5) Inattention Subscale, using two academic teachers and one parent for each participant. This 9-item subscale is specifically designed to evaluate the core ADHD symptoms of Inattention. By incorporating the perspectives of both teachers and parents, the investigators aim to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the participants' ADHD symptoms across settings. ADHD:RS-5: will be completed by prior school year teachers if the student has been in the class for less than 2 months. Higher scores represent a higher frequency of symptoms and this a worse outcome. For each item, 0 is the minimum and 3 is the maximum value.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJeff Nyquist, Ph.D.
jnyquist@neurotrainer.com9062507356
Backup ContactJulie Schweitzer, Ph.D.
Jschweitzer@ucdavis.edu

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026