Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Conditions
Brief summary
On the basis of the database established in the previous stage, a cohort analysis was conducted on patients with BDDH complicated by hip arthroscopy for minimally invasive treatment of glenoid and lip injury, according to which the indications of minimally invasive surgery for BDDH patients were optimized and surgical measures were improved. Achieve accurate and rapid repair, rehabilitation and functional recovery, serve national fitness, and treat people's injuries
Detailed description
Based on the work of the previous research group, we prospective constructed a bidirectional cohort of patients with critical hip dysplasia, and summarized the influencing factors for the surgical prognosis of patients with BDDH, so as to continuously optimize patient selection. On this basis, the cohort size was extended to analyze the difference in efficacy between arthroscopic glenolabial repair and glenolabial repair combined with soft tissue enhancement, and further improve the minimally invasive surgery to promote the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in BDDH patients
Interventions
OTHERnon-intervention
non-intervention
Sponsors
Peking University Third Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Inclusion criteria
\- Diagnosis of borderline hip dysplasia with glenolabial injury.
Exclusion criteria
\-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improved Harris hip score | Preoperative, 24 months after surgery | It is suitable for the evaluation of therapeutic effect of various hip diseases. The Harris score includes pain, function, deformity and range of motion. The lower the improved Harris score, the worse the postoperative effect. |
| PRO rating | Preoperative, 24 months after surgery | Based on Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) : Questionnaires were completed through face-to-face or telephone interviews. Patients' symptoms, function (activity restriction), pain score, quality of life and time to return to activity were evaluated comprehensively. The lower the PRO score, the worse the postoperative effect. |
| Cartilage damage outerbridge grading | Preoperative, 24 months after surgery | The patient underwent hip joint MR Examination at 12 months post-operative follow-up with T2 weighted intrachondral defect and high signal |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactJianquan Wang, M.D.
Outcome results
None listed