Skip to content

Goal-directed Enteral Nutritional Perioperative Management

Goal-directed Enteral Nutritional Therapy for Malnourished Esophageal Cancer Patients During Perioperative Management

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06510543
Acronym
GENTLEMAN
Enrollment
400
Registered
2024-07-19
Start date
2024-03-30
Completion date
2031-05-30
Last updated
2024-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophagus Cancer

Keywords

Esophageal Cancer, Esophagectomy, Nutritional Therapy, Morbidity, Survival, Malnourished

Brief summary

This clinical trial aims to determine whether perioperative goal-directed nutritional therapy can prevent postoperative pulmonary and other major complications in malnourished esophageal squamous cell cancer patients. Its main question is whether individualized nutritional therapy can improve short-term surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis. Researchers will compare goal-directed and conventional nutritional therapy to identify differences in morbidities and survival.

Detailed description

Severe malnutrition is a significant risk factor for postoperative complications in esophageal cancer patients. Early oral nutritional supplementation after surgery can prevent weight loss and improve quality of life. The EFFORT trial showed that individual-based enteral nutrition support reduced complications, extended 1-year survival, and improved quality of life. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of individualized perioperative nutrition support guided by daily energy targets in esophageal cancer patients at nutritional risk. It also seeks to determine if supplementing immunonutrition can effectively reduce postoperative complications. This study was conducted as a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial. The experiment group was administered goal-directed enteral nutritional therapy, while the control group received conventional enteral nutritional therapy. The study observed the participants' major pulmonary and other complications within 90 days post-surgery and nutritional status, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in both groups.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTGoal-directed EN therapy

The participants will be administered a supervised goal-directed nutritional therapy. The enteral nutrition (EN) regimens include homemade meals with or without ORAL IMPACT® according to the daily goal.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTConventional EN therapy

The participants will be administered the conventional nutritional therapy according to the Chinese expert consensus on perioperative nutritional support in enhanced recovery after surgery (2019 edition).

Sponsors

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18-80 years old; 2. ECOG PS 0\ 1; 3. NRS 2002 score ≥3; 4. Malnutrition diagnosed according to the GLIM criteria; 5. Histopathologically confirmed as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; 6. Primary tumors located in thoracic esophagus; 7. Resectable locally advanced disease with clinical stage II to IVA (8th edition UICC/AJCC) evaluated by a multidisciplinary team; 8. Neoadjuvant therapy will be administered, which may entail preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, chemotherapy only, or a combination of immunotherapy such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1; 9. Informed consent for random assignment and completion of the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. NRS 2002 score \< 3; 2. Upfront surgery without neoadjuvant treatment; 3. Any comorbidity interferes with the digestion and absorption of ORAL IMPACT®; 4. Receiving any other nutritional support during the study; 5. Unable to consume nutrition orally or receive it through tube feeding before surgery; 6. History of other malignancies in the past 5 years, except successfully treated basal-cell skin carcinoma and cervical tumors in situ; 7. Severe abnormalities of liver and kidney functions (ALT≥2 times the upper limit of normal; Total bilirubin Tbil≥2 upper limit of normal; Creatinine Cr≥2 upper limit of normal); 8. Metabolic disorders, including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or fasting blood glucose ≥10mmol/L, hypothyroidism, or hyperthyroidism; 9. Receiving fat emulsion containing Omega-3 fatty acids, glutamine, thymosin, glucocorticoid, thyroxine, growth hormone, and anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic agents 10. History of known allergy to any component of ORAL IMPACT®; 11. Pregnant or lactating women, women of childbearing potential with either a positive pregnancy test at baseline or not using a reliable and appropriate contraceptive method; 12. Refuse to sign the consent or unable to follow the study protocol; 13. Inappropriate to participate in this study judged by investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of postoperative pulmonary complicationsRandomization to three months after surgeryAccording to the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) standardization of complications reporting, pulmonary complications include pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, atelectasis, mucous plugging, respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute aspiration, tracheobronchial injury, and prolonged air-leak.
Rate of unplanned hospital admissionsRandomization to three months after surgeryAny admission (all cause) for an unforeseen or unplanned (non-elective) cause within 90 days of discharge from an index acute hospital admission.
Rate of unplanned ICU admissionRandomization to three months after surgeryAny admission (all cause) for an unforeseen or unplanned (non-elective) cause within 90 days of discharge from an index acute ICU admission.
Overall survivalRandomization to five yearsThe time from randomization to death. Any patients lost to follow up or still alive at the time of evaluation are censored.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)Randomization to three months after surgeryAn event that emerges during treatment having been absent pre-treatment, or worsens relative to the pre-treatment state.
Rate of R0 resectionRandomization to three months after surgeryDistance between tumor and the circumferential resection margin (CRM) more than 1 mm.
Rate of postoperative non-pulmonary complicationsRandomization to three months after surgeryNon-pulmonary complications according to the ECCG standardization of complications reporting.
Disease-free survival (DFS)Randomization to five yearsDefined as the proportion of patients without disease progression or death.
Scale of health-related quality of life (HRQOL)Randomization to three months after surgeryA state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease and infirmity evaluated by EORTC OES18、EQ-5D、FAACT.
Rate of pathologic complete response (pCR)Randomization to three months after surgeryThe absence of invasive/in situ cancer in the resected esophagus and regional lymph nodes.
Level of serum prealbuminRandomization to three months after surgeryPrealbumin, also known as transthyretin, has a half-life in plasma of ∼2 days, much shorter than that of albumin. Prealbumin is therefore more sensitive to changes in protein-energy status than albumin, and its concentration closely reflects recent dietary intake rather than overall nutritional status.
Body mass index (BMI)Randomization to three months after surgeryA person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters.
Lean body massRandomization to three months after surgeryThe weight of the body minus the⁣ fat content, representing the amount of⁣ muscle, bone, and organs in the body.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiaozheng Kang, M.D.
kangxz@cicams.ac.cn+86 13910052790

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026