Cardiovascular Syndrome, Metabolic
Conditions
Keywords
Exercise, Concurrent training, Cardiovascular risk, Physical Fitness, Global rate scale, Adherence
Brief summary
Aim: To determine the efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment compared to pharmacological treatment alone in controlling cardiovascular risk factors and physical capacity in adults enrolled in a Cardiovascular Health Program. Research Design: This pilot randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) evaluates the efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment versus pharmacological treatment alone. Outcomes: blood pressure, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory capacity, body composition, adherence to the exercise guide, and patient perception of intervention effects, sociodemographic and medical background, physical activity level, Population: Adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia will be recruited during regular check-up hours. Detailed study information will be provided, and informed consent obtained. Sample Size: The sample size is 15 subjects per group, accounting for a 30% dropout rate, resulting in 39 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to experimental (EG) or control groups (CG) with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Allocation concealment will be ensured with opaque, sealed envelopes. Evaluations: Pre- and post-intervention evaluations will be conducted in both groups. Sociodemographic and medical background information will be collected through clinical record reviews. Blood pressure, heart rate, glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, adherence to the exercise guide, and patient perception of intervention effects will be measured using standardized procedures by trained kinesiologists.
Detailed description
SCIENTIFIC COMPONENT, METHODOLOGY, ETHICS, AND PLANNING RESEARCH QUESTION AND HYPOTHESIS Research Question What is the efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment, compared to pharmacological treatment alone, in controlling cardiovascular risk factors and physical capacity in adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia during 2024? Hypothesis H1: The efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment is greater than pharmacological treatment alone in controlling cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and physical capacity in adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia during 2024. (group difference hypothesis) H0: The efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment is equal to pharmacological treatment alone in controlling CVRF and physical capacity in adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia during 2024. (group difference hypothesis) Statistical Hypothesis Group difference hypothesis: * H0: μA = μB * H1: μA \> μB OBJECTIVES General Objective To determine the efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment, compared to pharmacological treatment alone, in controlling cardiovascular risk factors and physical capacity in adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia during 2024. 2.2.2 Specific Objectives * To describe the effects of applying a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide on cardiovascular risk factors in adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia. * To describe the effects of applying a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide on physical capacity in adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia. * To evaluate adherence to the personalized concurrent exercise guide and pharmacological treatment in adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia. * To describe the clinical significance of the interventions through the calculation of effect size and the clinical relevance perceived by the participants regarding the interventions. 2.3 METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES Research Design The research design corresponds to a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) with parallel groups and superiority. This design aligns with the general objective and proposed hypothesis, aiming to evaluate the efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment, compared to pharmacological treatment alone, in controlling cardiovascular risk factors and physical capacity. The primary study variables include blood pressure, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, which are standard measurements for the Cardiovascular Health Program. Secondary variables include sociodemographic and medical background, level of physical activity, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory capacity, body composition, adherence to the exercise guide, and patient perception of changes experienced due to the intervention. Population The study population will consist of adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program (PSCV) enrolled in the External CESFAM in Valdivia. The research team will directly invite PSCV users during their regular check-up hours. Research professionals will be properly identified as staff from Universidad San Sebastián and will provide detailed information about the research, the exercise prescription guide application, program duration, benefits, and risks. Interested participants will be asked to sign informed consent. The recruitment period will last up to 1 month, extendable by another month if necessary to obtain the required sample size. Sample Size Calculation The sample size calculation is based on recommendations from the literature for pilot studies and includes: * T-test - Means: difference between two independent means, * Type I error: 5%, * Statistical power: 80%, * Effect size (ES): 0.5 according to Cohen's classification. Using these parameters, the recommended total sample size is fifteen subjects per group. Assuming a 30% dropout rate, the total population will correspond to thirty-nine participants. After the eligibility process, participants will be randomly assigned to an experimental group (EG) and a control group (CG) using a 1:1 allocation ratio through an online randomization system. Allocation concealment will be maintained using opaque, sealed, and consecutively numbered envelopes. The experimental group will receive the intervention based on the personalized exercise prescription guide plus their usual pharmacological treatment associated with the PSCV, while the control group will maintain their usual pharmacological treatment associated with the PSCV. Information Production Techniques All evaluations will be performed pre- and post-intervention in both the experimental and control groups. Clinical Record Review: The PSCV's responsible physician, with prior authorization from the External CESFAM's management and approval from the Valdivia Health Service Ethics Committee, will review the participants' medical records, collecting information on sociodemographic and medical background: sex, age, education, time in the cardiovascular health program, medical history, medications, dosage, and duration of medication use. These variables will be used to characterize the study sample. Evaluations and follow-up will be conducted by trained Kinesiologists in evaluation techniques, exercise prescription, and cardiovascular risk factors, at the University of San Sebastián Health Center in Valdivia. A professional Kinesiologist will measure the variables, blinded to the participant's intervention assignment. These evaluations will encompass Cardiovascular Variables Evaluation, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Metabolic Variables, Health-related Physical Capacity, Adherence to Treatment, and the Global Rating of Change Scale. 2.4 ANALYSIS OF ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS Risk-Benefit Analysis This study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring informed consent is obtained from all participants. The intervention will be conducted in both groups, with evaluations presenting minimal risk. Users may experience post-exercise muscle fatigue, which could last up to 48 hours, mitigated through education about exercise effects. The benefits include updated knowledge about participants' health status and physical capacity, with personalized exercise shown to effectively control cardiovascular risk factors. Confidentiality Protection The clinical record review will be conducted at the External CESFAM by the PSCV responsible, and physical evaluations will be conducted at the University of San Sebastián Health Center. Participants will be assigned unique codes to preserve anonymity, with informed consent clearly stating data will not be used for purposes other than the study. Collected information will be stored securely by the Principal Investigator for 4 years, after which it will be handed over to the CESFAM. Only the research team will have access to the results.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALConcurrent training
Protocol: Duration: 6 weeks. Frequency: 3 times a week. Type: Concurrent. This consists of a combination of aerobic exercise and muscular resistance exercise. Details of the type of exercise: Aerobic exercise: Participants will perform 5-10 intervals per session of walking or jogging at a moderate to high intensity, with a rating of 5 to 10 points on the modified Borg scale of 1-10 points. Each interval will consist of 1 minute of walking or jogging, followed by 2 minutes of inactive pause. Muscular resistance exercise: Participants will perform concentric and eccentric and/or isometric contractions for 1 minute at an intensity of 5-10 according to the OMNI-RES scale. The rest period will last 2 minutes, and each exercise will be repeated 3 times. Three exercises per session will be performed: squats, push-ups, and plank. Pharmacological treatment: Participants will be asked to maintain their lifestyle, including taking prescribed medication as usual.
Sponsors
Universidad San Sebastián
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The concealment of allocation will be conducted by a researcher not involved in the clinical procedures of the intervention using the method of opaque, sealed, and consecutively numbered envelopes. The random sequence and allocation concealment allow for the control of selection bias. For enhanced bias control, the data analysis will be performed by a researcher blinded to the intervention groups.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Being physically inactive (not engaging in 300 or 150 minutes of moderate or vigorous intensity physical activity per week, respectively, as measured by the IPAQ questionnaire); 2. Body mass index between 25 and 39.9 kg/m²; 3. Enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Program; 4. Diagnosis of hypertension with the use of 1 and/or 2 antihypertensive medications; 5. Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with the use of 1 oral hypoglycemic agent, non-insulin-dependent; 6. Diagnosis of dyslipidemia with the use of 1 lipid-lowering agent; 7. Possession of a telephone device.
Exclusion criteria
1. Bone disease; 2. Ischemic disease or arrhythmia; 3. Chronic respiratory disease; 4. Uncontrolled chronic diseases; 5. Inability to provide informed consent or comply with the tests and exercise protocol for any reason; 6. History of oncological disease or being under investigation for suspected neoplastic disease in any part of the body; 7. Female participants who are pregnant.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Global Rating Scale | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | The Global Rating Scale (GRS) will be applied as an instrument for evaluating the patient's perception of changes experienced in their health status, functionality, or symptoms. The methodology for implementing the GRS will involve asking patients to provide a rating of their current health status compared to an established reference point, which, in our case, will be the beginning of the study. The GRS will be presented in two formats: Numeric: Offering a range that can vary, for example, from -7 (much worse) to +7 (much better), allowing for a gradable assessment of changes. Descriptive: Providing qualitative terms such as much worse, no change, or much better, facilitating patients' expression of their perception of change in a more narrative manner. The unit of measurement for the GRS is the position on the numeric scale or the descriptive term that best represents the patient's perception of change. |
| Heart Rate | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Number of heartbeats per minute. (bpm) |
| Fasting Glucose | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Blood glucose level after a fasting period. (mg/dL) |
| Cholesterol | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Blood cholesterol refers to the total amount of cholesterol present in the bloodstream. (mg/dL) |
| Triglycerides | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Blood triglycerides are a type of fat (lipid) found in the bloodstream. (mg/dL) |
| Body Mass Index | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | The Body Mass Index (BMI) is a metric used to assess the relationship between an individual's weight and height, thereby estimating their weight category, which can range from underweight to obesity. It is calculated by dividing a person's weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters. The formula is: BMI = weight (kg) / \[height (m)\]\^2 The unit of measurement for BMI is kg/m² (kilograms per square meter). |
| Lean Mass | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Lean mass, also known as lean body mass, refers to the portion of the body that is not composed of fat. It includes muscles, bones, internal organs, skin, body water, and other fat-free tissues. The unit of measurement for lean mass is (%). |
| Fat Mass | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Fat mass refers to the total amount of fat tissue in the body. The unit of measurement for lean mass is (%). |
| Handgrip strength | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Handgrip Dynamometry: Measurement of handgrip strength. (kgf) |
| Cardiorespiratory fitness | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | 2-Minute Step Test (2MST): is a functional fitness assessment used to evaluate an individual's cardiorespiratory fitness. During this test, the participant is instructed to march in place for two minutes, lifting their knees to a height midway between the patella (kneecap) and the iliac crest (hip bone). The goal is to count the number of times the right knee reaches the target height within the two-minute period. The primary unit of measurement for the 2-Minute Step Test is the number of steps, specifically the number of times the right knee reaches the required height within the two-minute duration. |
| VO2 peak | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) refers to the maximum amount of oxygen the body can utilize during intense exercise. It is measured in milliliters of oxygen consumed per kilogram of body weight per minute (ml/kg/min). Using the number of steps in the 2-minute walk test, VO2peak will be estimated. The equation to estimate peak oxygen consumption is: VO2 (mL⋅kg-1⋅min-1) = 13.341 + 0.138 × total steps - (0.183 × BMI). |
| Treatment Adherence | Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | In the context of this study, treatment adherence refers to the extent to which participants follow the prescribed physical exercise regimen. This variable is operationalized as the completion of at least 70% of the scheduled exercise sessions. A participant will be considered adherent if they complete at least 70% of the scheduled exercise sessions, according to the data obtained through the described measurement methods. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of completed sessions by the total number of scheduled sessions and multiplying the result by 100. |
| Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Pressure in the arteries during and between heartbeats. (mmHg) |
| Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Measure of the average pressure in a person's arteries during one cardiac cycle. MAP=Diastolic Blood Pressure + 1/3 (Systolic Blood Pressure-Diastolic Blood Pressure). mmHg |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks. | Total body mass. (kg) |
| Gender | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Gender: Biological classification of the individual. (No unit of measure) |
| Age | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Age: Number of complete years since birth. (Years) |
| Ancestry | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Ancestry: Ethnic or racial origin of the individual. (No unit of measure) |
| Education Level | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Education Level: Highest level of education achieved. (No unit of measure) |
| Duration in Cardiovascular Health Program | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Duration in Cardiovascular Health Program: Length of participation in the program. (Months or Years) |
| Morbid Background | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Morbid Background: History of previous diseases and medical conditions. (No unit of measure) |
| Medications and Dosage: | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Medications and Dosage: Description of used medications and their dosages. (mg/day or as prescribed) |
| Duration of Medication Use | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Duration of Medication Use: Length of time medications have been used. (Months or Years) |
| Physical Activity Level | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is a recognized instrument for assessing physical activity in adults. This survey outlines the frequency (measured in days per week) and duration (hours and minutes per day) of physical activities categorized into four intensity levels: sedentary, walking, moderate physical activity, and vigorous physical activity. For each intensity level, the units of measurement are expressed in days per week and hours or minutes per day, with specific Metabolic Equivalent Task (METs) values assigned to each activity (Walking: 3.3 METs, Moderate Physical Activity: 4 METs, Vigorous Physical Activity: 8 METs). The responses can be converted into MET-minutes/week, enabling a quantitative and consistent comparison of total physical activity, encompassing various types and intensities. |
| Height | Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. | Individual's height. (cm) |
Countries
Chile
Outcome results
None listed