Skip to content

SOLFA Study to Explore the Thrombogenicity of a Dialyzer

SOLFA Study: A Multicenter, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized Study to Explore the Clotting Propensity of Solacea™ Dialyser Comparing With Synthetic Membranes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06505616
Enrollment
32
Registered
2024-07-17
Start date
2022-01-17
Completion date
2023-05-20
Last updated
2024-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

Keywords

anticoagulation, heparin, biocompatibility, haemodialysis, haemodiafiltration, haemodialyser

Brief summary

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover, non-masked study to evaluate the impact on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit by comparing synthetic haemodialysers against the ATA membrane of the Solacea™.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover, non-masked study that included 32 patients from 4 Spanish hospitals. The objective of the present work is to evaluate the impact on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit by comparing synthetic haemodialysers against the ATA membrane of the Solacea™. Study population. Patients over 18 years of age in a chronic haemodialysis program who had been on dialysis for more than three months were included. All patients provided informed consent. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The exclusion criteria were allergies to synthetic membranes and allergies to heparin, patients receiving anticoagulant treatment, women Pregnant, breastfeeding or patients with cognitive impairment. In each of the two phases of six consecutive two-week HD sessions, patients were dialyzed according to their usual schedule with the haemodialyser assigned after randomization (synthetic vs ATA membrane). During the six sessions of both phases, the dose of heparin was progressively reduced, 100% usual heparin dose in the first session until sixth session without heparin. After each session, carried out a visual inspection of the venous chamber and the haemodialyser and assigned a coagulation score previously published. Dialyser score from 0 (completly clean, 0% coagulated fibers) to 4 (100% coagulated fibers). Venous chamber score from 0 (clean, without clotting) to 3 (complete oclusión, dialysis is not possible). Demographic data and dialysis parameters were also collected. The dialyzers from 8 patients were collected at the beginning and end of each study arm and scanned with a reference non-invasive micro-CT (Computed Tomography) scanning technique.

Interventions

DEVICECompared the trombogenicity of the Solacea dialyzer with synthetic dialyzers after progressively decreasing heparin until discontinuing it

The duration of the study was four weeks, carried out in two phases. After screening, patients were randomized to be dialyzed with the Solacea™ hemodialyzer versus the usual hemodialyzer, which in all cases had to be a synthetic membrane. In both arms, heparin was progressively decreased until it was discontinued. Afterwards the patients were crossed over to the other arm.

Sponsors

Fundación Senefro
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover, non-masked study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years of age. * Patients in a chronic haemodialysis program who had been on dialysis for more than three months were included. * Patients provided informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* allergies to synthetic membranes * allergies to heparin * patients receiving anticoagulant treatment * women Pregnant * breastfeeding * patients with cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit by comparing dialyzersfour weeks, carried out in two phasesThe investigators measure the impact of Solacea membrane on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit compared to other high-permeability synthetic dialysers commonly used in clinical practice. Heparin was progressively reduced until it was discontinued. After each session, investigators carried out a visual inspection of the venous chamber and the haemodialyser and assigned a coagulation score. In 8 patients also a scanning technique was carried out.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of heparin reduction or discontinuationfour weeks, carried out in two phasesThe investigators measure the effect of heparin reduction or discontinuation on vascular access haemostasis time, on dialysis efficacy by measuring KT, on percentage reduction of molecules such as myoglobin or β2-microglobulin, and in the amount of convective volume in patients in OL HDF. During the six sessions of both phases, the dose of heparin was progressively reduced until the last session without heparin. After each session, carried out a visual inspection of the venous chamber and the haemodialyser and assigned a coagulation score. In 8 patients also a scanning technique was carried out.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026