Skip to content

Results of 8 Strand Repair of Flexor Tendon Injuries

Results of 8 Strand Repair of Flexor Tendon Injuries Zone II With and Without Splinting of the Wrist A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06504680
Enrollment
52
Registered
2024-07-17
Start date
2024-08-10
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2024-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cut Flexor Zone ll Using 8-strand

Brief summary

Functional results of 8 strand repair of flexor tendon injuries zone II with and without splinting of the wrist

Detailed description

Flexor tendon injuries of the hand, account for 30% of all hand injuries, but are difficult to treat and are associated with frequent poor outcomes . While major progress has been made with the treatment of these injuries, current surgical treatment relies mostly on conventional suturing techniques with variable results, concluding in re-operation rates of 12%, and complication rate of up to 20% Restoration of tendon gliding is the goal when repairing flexor tendon injuries. The tendon forces experienced during postoperative, active flexion exercises are significantly larger than the tendon forces experienced by patients engaging in only passive flexion. Multistrand sutures (typically four- or six-strand repairs) may withstand much greater tension than conventional two-strand sutures during early active mobilization. However, multistrand (particularly eight-strand) repair requires complicated surgical skills; such repair is difficult. Here, we present a new eight-strand suture for flexor tendon repair that features easier passages through the tendons and fewer knots than existing approaches; it affords the necessary tensile strength to prevent both gap formation and ultimate failure. The important aspects of flexor tendon repair are that the suture should have sufficient mechanical strength, and it should not result in a bulky configuration, which would affect tendon gliding . Using the 8-strand repair technique and active mobilization performed by the patient is both practical and cost-saving. Intensive supervision of a hand therapist is generally not required. Notably improved outcomes have been achieved while preventing adhesions at the repair site.

Interventions

PROCEDURERepair of flexor tendon injury zone ll using 8- strand

Repair cut flexor zone ll using 8-strand with and without splinting the wrist

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patient 2. No fractures in the affected finger 3. Thumb is excluded 4. Duration of injury less than 2 weeks

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
range of motionSix month post operativeROM using Strickland criteria by finger goniometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hand function6 month post-operativeHand function using DASH score
Complications6 month post-operativeAs rupture , adhesion

Contacts

Primary ContactMostafa Mahmoud
mustafa100100@icloud.com01003046736

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026