Skip to content

Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Versus Aripiprazole in Clozapine-resistant Schizophrenia

Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Versus Aripiprazole on Psychopathology and Cerebral Perfusion in Clozapine-resistant Schizophrenia: a Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06501339
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-07-15
Start date
2024-08-10
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2024-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clozapine Resistant Schizophrenia

Keywords

Clozapine resistant, schizophrenia, Aripiprazole, m-ECT

Brief summary

The pharmacological treatment options in schizophrenia developing resistance to clozapine are limited. Few studies have found ECT as beneficial in TRS, including CRS. However, literature on the role of M-ECT in maintaining the therapeutic gains of acute ECT in CRS is lacking. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of M-ECT vs aripiprazole as an add-on to ongoing clozapine on the severity of symptom dimensions, cerebral perfusion, global functioning and cognitions in patients with CRS.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmaintenance ECT

Frequency of weekly sessions for 1 month, then fortnightly for 5 months

Aripiprazole 10 mg in the morning throughout the study period

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients clinically diagnosed with CRS (currently under clozapine) 2. Patients aged 18-60 years of either sex. 3. LAR giving voluntary written consent for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient already on ECT or aripiprazole. 2. History of psychoactive substance abuse or dependence. 3. Co-morbid psychiatric, major medical or neurological disorders. 4. History of organicity or significant head injury. 5. Pacemaker or metal in any body part, excluding the mouth. Pregnant and breastfeeding females.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Positive And Negative Syndome Scale scoreBaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange from baseline in Total, Positive, negative and general scores with treatment. Minimum value: 30; maximum value: 210. Higher score means worsening of symptoms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in regional cerebral blood flow by the SPECT-CT brainBaseline, 24 weeksChange frome baseline in regional cerebral blood flow by the SPECT-CT brain with treatment
change in the Monteal Cognitive Assessment scoresBaseline,6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weekschange from baseline in the Monteal Cognitive Assessment scores with treatment. Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 30: Higher score indicate better cognitive function
change in the Global Assessment of Functioning scoresBaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weekschange from baseline in the Global Assessment of Functioning scores with treatment Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 100: Higher score indicate better global functioning
Safety evaluationBaseline,6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksNumber of events observed in each patient and patients with at least one adverse event

Contacts

Primary ContactBiswa Ranjan Mishra, MD
psych_biswa@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in9438884220
Backup ContactDebadatta Mohapatra, MD
psych_debadatta@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026