Skip to content

Establishment of Emergency Surgery Triage and Checklist Management System

Establishment of Emergency Surgery Triage and Checklist Management System--A Mixed Method Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06501157
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-07-15
Start date
2024-06-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2025-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Checklist, Emergency Surgery, Perioperative/Postoperative Complications, Triage

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to develop and test a system for managing emergency surgery patients at Beijing Union Medical College Hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are: What information is necessary for effective patient triage and handovers between the emergency department, anesthesia, and ICU for surgical patients? How effective and feasible is a standardized handover process in improving patient outcomes and safety? Participants will: Be observed and have their handovers documented to identify key information required. Participate in implementing a new handover checklist and triage system. Researchers will compare the periods before and after implementing the new system to see if it: Reduces missed critical information during handovers. Decreases pre-surgery waiting times for critically ill patients. Improves overall patient safety and outcomes, including reducing postoperative complications, mortality rates, length of hospital stay, and medical costs.

Detailed description

The study will be conducted in several phases to establish a comprehensive emergency surgery triage and checklist management system at Beijing Union Medical College Hospital. Phase 1: Literature Review and Initial Assessment First, a comprehensive review of existing literature and past emergency surgery cases will be conducted to identify common issues and best practices. Phase 2: Expert Panel and Delphi Process An expert panel consisting of hospital management staff, anesthesiologists, emergency surgeons, ICU intensivists, and ER doctors will be formed. This panel will engage in a Delphi process to discuss and develop a standardized system for managing emergency surgery patients. Phase 3: System Implementation and Testing The newly developed system will be implemented and tested. Key metrics to be documented, evaluated, and compared include: The number of omitted information items during the emergency-anesthesia handover. Staff satisfaction with the new handover process across the emergency department, general surgery, anesthesia, and ICU. In-hospital mortality rate after surgery. Postoperative in-hospital complications, classified by Clavien-Dindo grading, and their incidence rate. Patient waiting times, including time to theatre and time to incision. Duration of the handover process. Incidence of follow-up calls to inquire about additional information after the handover. Phase 4: Evaluation and Comparison The effectiveness and feasibility of the new system will be evaluated by comparing the collected data before and after its implementation. This comparison will help determine the system's impact on improving patient outcomes, safety, and staff efficiency. By systematically addressing the critical points of patient handovers and emergency surgery management, this study aims to enhance overall healthcare quality and patient safety in emergency surgical settings.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for emergency surgery. * Patients whose condition is critical before surgery, requiring admission to the resuscitation room, emergency observation, or other hospital wards for treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of omitted informationOutcome will be assessed on the operative dayThe number of omitted information items during the emergency-anesthesia handover.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient waiting times, including time to theatre and time to incision.Outcome will be assessed on the operative dayTime to Theatre (TTT): This is defined as the duration from when it is determined that the patient needs surgery to the time the patient arrives at the operating theatre. Time to Knife (TTK): This is defined as the duration from when the patient enters the operating theatre to the time the first incision is made.
Feasibility of handover checklistOutcome will be assessed on the operative dayStaff satisfaction with the new handover process across the emergency department, general surgery, anesthesia, and ICU. Whether the handover checklist is considered necessary will and feasible will be assessed using a 5 point Likert scale.
In-hospital mortalityFrom date of admission until discharge, assessed up to 4 weeksIn-hospital mortality
In-hospital morbidityFrom date of admission until discharge, assessed up to 4 weeksIn-hospital morbidity will be documented and rated using Clavein-Dindo classification system

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026