Skip to content

Narrow-diameter Implants Replacing Maxillary Lateral Incisors

Five Year Outcomes at Two Narrow-diameter Implants to Replace Congenital Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06500923
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-07-15
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2024-06-15
Last updated
2024-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant Failed

Brief summary

To present the 5-year clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic outcomes in patients with congenitally missing lateral incisors (MLIs) rehabilitated with two narrow-diameter implants (NDIs).

Interventions

OTHEROral rehabilitation by means of implant-supported single unit crowns

Surgery: Implant placement; Prothetic rehabilitation: single unit crown

Sponsors

Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients affected by congenital missing with uni- or bilateral maxillary lateral incisors (i.e. 12 and/or 22) * Patients with systemic health or controlled medical conditions * Patients arrested skeletal growth as documented by two body height measurements at least one year apart not indicating continuous growth (Jensen, 2019) * Written Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients contraindications to implant therapy (Hwang & Wang, 2006, 2007) including * Heavy smoking: \>20 cigarettes/day * Poor oral hygiene * Compromised compliance * Periodontally compromised conditions * Patients with MLI's with the canine situated in the MLI region

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peri-implant marginal bone level changes1 yearChanges in mm at the 1-year follow-up visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant Survival rate (%)1-3-5 yearNumber of implants in situ over the number of placed implants
Aesthetic outcomes1-3-5 yearEvaluation of the aesthetic outcomes by means of a dedicated Index (Copenhagen Index Score CPI) (Score 1-4 / Score 1: best outcome; 4 : worst outcome)
PROMs1-3-5 yearOHIP - 49 Scale (Score 1-3) (Score 1: best outcome; 3 : worst outcome)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026