Dental Implant Failed
Conditions
Brief summary
To present the 5-year clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic outcomes in patients with congenitally missing lateral incisors (MLIs) rehabilitated with two narrow-diameter implants (NDIs).
Interventions
Surgery: Implant placement; Prothetic rehabilitation: single unit crown
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients affected by congenital missing with uni- or bilateral maxillary lateral incisors (i.e. 12 and/or 22) * Patients with systemic health or controlled medical conditions * Patients arrested skeletal growth as documented by two body height measurements at least one year apart not indicating continuous growth (Jensen, 2019) * Written Informed Consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patients contraindications to implant therapy (Hwang & Wang, 2006, 2007) including * Heavy smoking: \>20 cigarettes/day * Poor oral hygiene * Compromised compliance * Periodontally compromised conditions * Patients with MLI's with the canine situated in the MLI region
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Peri-implant marginal bone level changes | 1 year | Changes in mm at the 1-year follow-up visit |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Survival rate (%) | 1-3-5 year | Number of implants in situ over the number of placed implants |
| Aesthetic outcomes | 1-3-5 year | Evaluation of the aesthetic outcomes by means of a dedicated Index (Copenhagen Index Score CPI) (Score 1-4 / Score 1: best outcome; 4 : worst outcome) |
| PROMs | 1-3-5 year | OHIP - 49 Scale (Score 1-3) (Score 1: best outcome; 3 : worst outcome) |
Countries
Denmark