Skip to content

Bilateral Subthalamic Stimulation in PD Patients With Impulse Control Disorders - STIMPulseControl

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Bilateral Subthalamic Stimulation in Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Impulse Control Disorders

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06498349
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-07-12
Start date
2024-09-05
Completion date
2028-07-15
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impulse Control Disorders, Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

The focus of the study is on patients Parkinson's disease showing as well behavioral disorders that can be described as pathological and are summarized under the term impulse control disorder (ICD). Changes in behavior and also pathological disorders are a common side effect of treatment for Parkinson's disease. The goal of this academic study is to compare the effect of surgical (deep brain stimulation, DBS) treatment combined with a coordinated and adapted best medical treatment (BMT) to be compared with the effect of optimized best medical treatment (BMT) alone. The stimulation arm (DBS+BMT) as well as the medication arm (BMT only) will be monitored according to clinical routine. Participants will have to agree to be randomly assigned to either deep brain stimulation in combination with the best medical treatment (DBS group) or the best medical treatment alone (BMT group). Participants will have to come regularly according to clinical routine to the clinic and complete various questionaires and scales for the study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREbilateral high frequency deep brainstimulation of the subthalamic nucleus combined with best medical treatment

according to widely accepted expert consensus paper

DRUGbest medical treatment (BMT): Adjustment of the dopaminergic medication and non-dopaminergic therapy customized for each patient according to the latest published Consensus Group Recommendations

according to (Debove et al (2024), 'Management of Impulse Control and Related Disorders in Parkinson's Disease: An Expert Consensus, Mov Disord.

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
CollaboratorOTHER
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Location Academic Medical Center (AMC)
CollaboratorOTHER
Philipps University Marburg
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
CollaboratorOTHER
Czech Technical University in Prague
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pennsylvania
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Kiel
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Better personalized therapy adaptation and care for patients with behavioral disorders is possible. This is often currently not possible in routine clinical practice. The scale for primary outcome used as the main target has been tested for use and is suitable for the study purpose of monitoring ICD. We now want to examine what patients with ICD benefit most from.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age at the time of enrollment: ≤ 70 years 2. Diagnosis of PD according to MDS clinical diagnostic criteria 3. Onset of first PD motor symptoms ≥ 4 years 4. Moderate or severe impulse control disorder or related behavioral disorders according to Ardouin, with at least 1 score greater than or equal to 3 (or at least 2 scores greater than or equal to 2) on the Ardouin behaviour scale with the following items considered to reflect ICBDs or related behaviors: pathological gambling, hypersexuality, shopping, eating, hobbyism, punding and compulsive medication use 5. MDS-UPDRS III improvement of ≥ 30% in the standardized levodopa test or classical Parkinsonian tremor at rest 6. Adaptation of medical therapy has been attempted 7. MoCA ≥ 24 in the meds on condition 8. BDI-II score \< 20 in the meds on condition, or Patients with moderately severe depression with a BDI-II between 20 and 28 points, strict consideration must be made with the involvement of a psychiatrist. Patients must be willing and able to comply this. 9. Patients able to understand the study requirements and the treatment procedures 10. Written informed consent before any study-specific tests or procedures are performed

Exclusion criteria

11. Surgical contraindications to undergo DBS operation 12. Ongoing severe depression (BDI-II \> 28) 13. suicidal ideation (item 9 of BDI-II \> 1) 14. Dementia (MoCA \< 24) in the meds on condition 15. Any prior movement disorder treatments that involved intracranial surgery/ablation or intracranial device implantation 16. Any other active implanted device that is likely to interfere with the implantation or functioning of the DBS system 17. Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial targeting or potentially interfering with ICD 18. Any history of recurrent seizures or haemorrhagic stroke 19. Fertile women not using adequate contraceptive methods 20. Any terminal illness with significantly reduced life expectancy which exclude DBS implantation according to standard clinical care 21. A female who is breastfeeding or of child-bearing potential with a positive urine pregnancy test or not using adequate contraception 22. Any impairment that would limit subject's ability to participate in the study and perform study procedures 23. Have any significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures or likely to confound evaluation of study endpoints

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ardouin Scale of Behaviour in Parkinson's Disease (ASBPD)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups with respect to the hyperdopaminergic sub-score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marconi Dyskinesia Rating Scale12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (QUIP RS)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Starkstein-Apathy-Scale (SAS)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
suicidal item 9 of the BDI12 monthssafety focus on suicidal item 9 of the BDI with reference to the question for the last 2 months
Neuropsychiatric-fluctuations scale (NFS)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Young mania rating scale (YMRS)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Quality of life (PDQ-39) measured by Parkinson Disease Questionaire-39 Summary Index12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (parts I-IV med on/med off and stim on/stim off; if applicable12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Levodopa-equivalent/dopamine-agonist dosage (LEDD) and other medication12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Safety weight monitoring (BMI control)12 monthsDifference of change from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Clinical Global Impression (CGI-S, Severity) (CGI-C, Change)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Patient Global Impression (PGI-S, Severity) (PGI-C, Change)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Parkinson's disease Dysarthria Compound Score (PD-DCS) (Speech assessment)12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups
Adverse events12 monthsReporting and analysis of adverse events: Frequency, type and severity of therapy related relevant adverse events of medication or DBS
Parkinson's disease Dysarthria Compound Score (PD-DCS)12 monthsAn intra-group comparison will be performed between the individual patient's safety speech outcome of Parkinson's disease Dysarthria Compound Score (PD-DCS) The PD-DCS is a speech acoustic summary measure of the main speech affected domains in PD, namely monopitch, monoloudness, imprecise consonants, inappropriate silences, harsh/breathy voice, and speech timing abnormalities. Acoustic proxy measures of these perceptual speech domains can be extracted from speech using modern acoustic speech analysis.
Zarit Burden Interview ( ZIB) for the change of burden assessment in caregivers using the brief version12 monthsDifference of change (improvement) from baseline to follow-up between the two treatment groups

Countries

Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactSteffen Paschen, MD
steffen.paschen@uksh.de+49 (0)431 500
Backup ContactGuenther Deuschl, Prof.
g.deuschl@neurologie.uni-kiel.de

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026