Skip to content

Accuracy of Non Invasive Hemoglobin Measure by SpHb Device in Post Operative Anemia Diagnosis

Accuracy of Non Invasive Hemoglobin Measure by SpHb Device in Post Operative Anemia Diagnosis: a Validation Study in Gynecological Surgery Department of Angers 's University Hospital

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06497335
Acronym
SpHb_gyneco
Enrollment
150
Registered
2024-07-11
Start date
2024-06-30
Completion date
2026-01-31
Last updated
2024-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Keywords

post operative screening, anemia, iron deficiency, diagnosis

Brief summary

Non invasive Hemoglobin monitoring by SpHb device had been developed to assess Hemoglobin level during hemorrhagic surgery. It's accuracy to detect post operative anemia on a single post operative measure has been recently demonstrated on a cohort of post operative orthopedic patient and it's routine use has been generalized to other surgical department. This study aims to valid these finding on a cohort of post operative patients from gynaecological department.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTnon invasive hemoglobin measure

non invasive hemoglobin measure

Sponsors

University Hospital, Angers
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* being hospitalized for gynecological procedure: hysterectomy or cancer related annexectomy * \> 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* non french speaker * being under a legal individual protection measure * not being able to consent * being opposed to data collection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
accuracy between SpHb measure and Hemoglobin level on the post operative blood sampleat 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocollevel of immediate post operative SpHb measure compared to blood hemoglobin measure, ROC curve

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kappa coefficientat 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocolcorrelation between SpHb measure and correct classification of patients anemia vs no anemia
Intra class correlation coefficientat 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocolcorrelation between Laboratory measurement and SpHb measurement
Subgroup analysis of ROC curve (classes of age 18-30; 30-40; 40-50; >50)at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocolcomparison of ROC curve areas in subgroups
Spearman correlation coefficientat 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocolcorrelation between Laboratory Hb and SpHb measure
impact of perfusion index on accuracy of SpHbat 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocolcomparison of ROC curve areas in subgroups of perfusion index (good or low perfusion index)
impact of leght between SpHb measurement and laboratory Hb measurement on accuracyat 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocolcomparison of ROC curve areas in subgroups of lenght in days between SpHb measurement and Laboratory Hb measurement
impact of body temperature on accuracy of SpHbat 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocolcomparison of ROC curve areas in subgroups of temperature (classes of temperature : \<35; 35-36; \>36)

Contacts

Primary ContactSigismond Lasocki
SiLasocki@chu-angers.fr02/41/35/36/37
Backup ContactElise Houssin
DRCI-Promotion-Interne@chu-angers.fr02 41 35 36 37

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026