Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effect of Micro-osteoperforation on the Rate of Bone Anchored Molar Distalization

Evaluation of the Effect of Micro-osteoperforation on the Rate of Bone Anchored Molar Distalization: a Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06497244
Enrollment
18
Registered
2024-07-11
Start date
2023-09-10
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2024-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Microosteoperforations

Brief summary

The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate three dimensionally, using digital models and cone beam computed tomography imaging, the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement in the first molar distalization.

Detailed description

The design of this randomized controlled clinical trial is a parallel group, two arms trial * Preparatory phase * Self-drilling mini-screws will be placed buccally between upper 2nd premolar and 1st molar bilaterally in the last NiTi wire insertion visit. * After the completion of levelling and alignment phase an intra oral scan will be made for the upper arch and a rigid stainless-steel retraction arch wire 0.017 x 0.025 will be inserted. * The patient will then be referred to the radiology center and a pre-retraction cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image will be taken for the maxillary arch (T0). * Experimental phase * Subjects will receive MOPs randomly to either the left or right maxillary molar buccal alveolar regions. MOPs will be performed at the first day of the distalization treatment (T0) and will repeated every 2 months. * Molar distalization will started immediately after performing the MOPs using sliding jig distalizer. * The force will be applied to the mini-screw with the sliding jig mechanics on average 300 gm using Nickel-titanium closing coil springs. * Before leaving the clinic, the patient will be asked to: * Use chlorhexidine three times per day for 3 days after MOP applications. * avoid using pain killers (except Panadol when needed). * fill in a Numeric pain rating scale. * Follow up phase * Follow up visits will be scheduled every 4 weeks for reactivation coil spring and check TADs stability. * An intra oral scan for the upper arch will made every visit. * The study time will be continued for 6 months (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6). * The same technique of MOP will be repeated after 2 and 4 months of follow up (T2,T4). * After 6 months of follow up, the final dental model will made, and the patient will be referred to the same radiology center to acquire the post-distalization CBCT.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmicro osteo-perforation

the patient will receive miniscrew micro osteo-perforation in one side every month with molar distalization and the other side the distalization without micro osteo-perforation

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The first assessor will perform the digital models & CBCT measurements blindly for each patient. The second assessor will perform the same measurements blindly to calculate the inter-observer error

Intervention model description

Subjects will receive MOPs randomly to either the left or right maxillary molar buccal alveolar regions. MOPs will be performed at the first day of the distalization treatment (T0) and will repeated every 2 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients 2. Skeletal Class I or mild Class II relationship 3. Dental class II bilaterally (non-extraction cases) 4. Full permanent dentition including 2nd maxillary molars 5. Good oral hygiene 6. Medically free

Exclusion criteria

1. Systemic diseases that may interfere with the treatment 2. Use of any medications that might have affected the biology of tooth movement 3. unilateral Class II molar relationship 4. extreme skeletal Class II relationship (ANB \>7°) 5. periodontal disease or alveolar bone loss 6. Patients with dental anomalies in maxillary 1st molar

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
rate of molar distalization6 monthsIncremental rate of molar distalization every month by intra oral scan superimposition
total molar distalization distance by mm between T6 and T06 monthsTotal distance moved by the molar after 6 months by intra oral scan superimposition and measure the linear difference in position 1st molar between T6 and T0 by mm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effect of MOPs on Maxillary 1st molar vertical movement by mm between T6 and T06 monthscomparing the pre- & post- distalization CBCT and measure the linear change in the 1st molar vertical position by mm between T6 and T0
The effect of MOPs on Maxillary 1st molar tipping by degrees between T6 and T06 monthscomparing the pre- & post- distalization CBCT and measure the angular change in the 1st molar long axis tipping by degree between T6 and T0
Detecting any Pain or discomfort caused by the micro-osteoperforations using Numeric pain rating scale1 weekusing Numeric Pain Rating Scale filled by the patient with minimum value is zero and maximum value 10 (the higher score mean worse outcome)
The effect of MOPs on 1st molar root resorption level by mm between T6 and T06 monthscomparing the pre- & post- distalization CBCT and measure the amount of root resorption of 1st molar roots by mm between T6 and T0
The effect of MOPs on Maxillary 1st molar rotation by degrees between T6 and T06 monthscomparing the pre- & post- distalization digital models and CBCT and measure the angular change in the 1st molar long axis rotation by degree between T6 and T0

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Elsayed, PhD
mohamedessam4@hotmail.com00201064111810

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026