Tooth Extraction Status Nos
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the vertical extraction system Benex and Physics forceps with the conventional extraction tools (extraction forceps and elevators) in the early wound healing period after tooth extraction, as means for minimally invasive tooth extraction. All patients aged 18 years and over who require closed tooth extraction with good oral hygiene were eligible for participation. Participants were randomly allocated to tooth extraction with either Benex, Physics forceps or conventional extraction tools using box randomization. Patients are followed up during the recovery period to assess pain and early wound healing, while at the time of extraction, success and buccal cortical plate fracture were evaluated.
Interventions
PROCEDURETooth extraction
A regular closed tooth extraction was performed with the different devices from each arm.
DEVICEBenex
Benex was used to perform the intervention.
DEVICEPhysics Forceps
Physics forceps were used to perform the intervention.
DEVICEConventional Extraction Forceps
Conventional Extraction Forceps were used to perform the intervention.
Sponsors
Plovdiv Medical University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with teeth indicated for closed extraction * Teeth with at least 1mm of tissue above the bone level * Patients without contraindications for surgical intervention (ASA 1 or 2) * Patients with good oral hygiene
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with severe systemic conditions or immunosuppression * Teeth with mobility greater than Grade 1 * Teeth indicated for open surgical extraction * Patients with acute odontogenic infections * Drug or alcohol abuse * Patients with psychiatric conditions * Patients on anticoagulant or antiaggregant drugs refusing to undergo prior tests and preparation for tooth extraction * Patients on chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or oral bisphosphonate intake
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Extraction success | From the beginning of the extraction to the completion of the procedure | The scale suggested by Choi was used to assess each of the extraction systems. Scored from 1 to 5. Higher is better. |
| Alveolar bone buccal cortical plate preservation | From the beginning of the extraction to the completion of the procedure | The difference between the height of the alveolar bone buccal cortical plate is measured before and after the tooth extraction. Scored in milimeters missing. Lower is better. |
| VAS pain score | 0, 1, 3, 7 day | Patients were asked to rate their pain experience on a visual analog scale (VAS). Measured in centimeters on 10cm line. Lower is better. |
| Early wound healing | 3, 7, 10 day | Landry's early wound healing index was used to evaluated the extraction healing process. Scores from 1 to 5. Higher is better. |
Countries
Bulgaria
Outcome results
None listed