Skip to content

Evaluating the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Models in Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission Needs

Evaluating the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Models in Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission Needs

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06494748
Enrollment
8043
Registered
2024-07-10
Start date
2024-07-15
Completion date
2024-10-02
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intensive Care Unit

Keywords

artificial intelligence

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting the need for ICU admissions. By comparing the AI models' predictions with actual clinical decisions, we aim to determine their accuracy and potential utility in clinical decision support.

Detailed description

Intensive care units (ICUs) are critical components of healthcare systems, providing life-saving care to patients with severe and life-threatening conditions. Timely and accurate prediction of ICU admission needs is essential for improving patient outcomes and optimizing hospital resource allocation. Delayed ICU admissions have been consistently associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, there is an opportunity to enhance clinical decision-making by leveraging AI models to predict ICU needs accurately. AI models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, can process vast amounts of complex data to identify patterns that might not be immediately evident to human clinicians, potentially improving the speed and accuracy of ICU admission decisions. This is an observational retrospective study. Data were collected from electronic health records (EHRs) from a hospital retrospectively. Data were extracted from EHRs and included: Demographic data: Age, gender, and basic patient characteristics. Clinical parameters: Medication information, consultation details, ECG findings, imaging results, comorbid conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, COPD, cerebrovascular events), and laboratory values (e.g., hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, PT, INR, procalcitonin, ALT, AST, bilirubin, sodium, potassium, chloride, glucose, creatinine, urea, albumin, thyroid function tests). Prediction data: AI model predictions and actual ICU admission decisions.

Interventions

OTHERFollow up Decision

0: No need to follow up in Intensive Care Unit 1: Need to follow up in Intensive Care Unit

Sponsors

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over the age of 18 * Patients consulted for anesthesia regarding intensive care needs * Patients with sufficient data in the hospital's electronic health record system

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with insufficient data in the hospital records

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensive Care Unit Need1 dayThe primary outcome measure of this study is the accuracy of the predictions made by the artificial intelligence (AI) models, ChatGPT and Gemini, regarding the need for ICU admissions. This will be evaluated by comparing the AI model predictions to the actual clinical decisions made regarding ICU admissions.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026