Skip to content

Evaluation of a Differentiated Point-of-care Active Case Finding & Management Model to Eliminate Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Malawi

UNCPM 22401 - Evaluation of a Differentiated Point-of-care Active Case Finding & Management Model for the Elimination of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Lilongwe and Mangochi, Malawi

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06493357
Acronym
PAC-Man
Enrollment
2426
Registered
2024-07-10
Start date
2025-03-27
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2026-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Prevention

Keywords

HIV Treatment

Brief summary

Purpose: To conduct a hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge trial to: 1. Estimate the effect of the PAC-Man model, compared to SOC, on the proportion of infants who receive timely EID testing. 2. Estimate the effect of the PAC-Man model, compared to SOC, on the proportion of pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV who receive guideline-adherent viral load testing. 3. Compare implementation outcomes between the PAC-Man model and SOC. Participants: The total study sample size is 2,426, including 2,304 mother-infant pair (MIP) survey participants, 48 high-risk pregnant/breastfeeding women living with HIV for in-depth interviews (from high-risk MIPs who participated in a survey); 10 PMTCT policy makers and Ministry of Health (MOH)/ President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) implementing partner senior managers for key informant interviews; and about 48-64 professional and lay health providers for focus group discussions and implementation actor surveys. To rigorously evaluate the PAC-Man model, investigators will use a hybrid (type 3) effectiveness-implementation incomplete stepped-wedge trial design. The hybrid incomplete stepped-wedge design is a rigorous quasi-experimental design that allows for incremental "rollout" of the PAC-Man model and serial measurement of both health outcomes (for infants and mothers in Objectives 1 and 2, respectively), as well as implementation outcomes (Objective 3). The incomplete stepped-wedge design is more efficient than a complete design, minimizes costs, and reduces participant burden, without sacrificing statistical precision. Using this design, sequential crossover from control (i.e., the SOC) to intervention (i.e., SOC plus the PAC-Man model) takes place at each 'step' using cluster randomization until all clusters (defined as a group of "sites," or health facilities plus the surrounding communities in its catchment area) receive the intervention. The 12 sites included in our study will be divided into 4 clusters of 3 sites each.

Detailed description

PAC-Man Model: PAC-Man represents an integrated differentiated services delivery (DSD) model for mothers and infants that brings the following three evidence-based practices into the community for elimination of mother to child transmission (EMTCT): 1) pediatric active case finding using novel point-of-care (POC) early infant diagnosis (EID) technology; 2) same-day antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation for infants newly diagnosed with HIV infection; and 3) maternal viral load (mVL) testing and back-to-care services. PAC-Man uses a mobile approach to offer EMTCT services in the community and reach "high risk" MIPs in which the mother living with HIV did not initiate ART, started ART late during pregnancy or breastfeeding, dropped off treatment following ART initiation, was unsuppressed on ART, was identified with HIV infection for the first-time during the post-partum period, and/or did not return with her infant for EID testing. Because these evidence-based practices are already recommended by the Ministry of Health and will be functioning at the site and not the individual level, delivering the PAC-Man model will be done under the auspices of routine care, applying an overarching implementation strategy of creating new mobile care teams equipped with new diagnostic technology who deploy the m-PIMA™ in community settings. PAC-Man Implementation Approaches: The overall implementation strategy being evaluated in this study is the creation of mobile care teams to deploy m-PIMA™ and provide EMTCT services in the community. Complementing this overarching strategy will be two sub-strategies used to enhance PAC-Man adoption: 1) task shifting of active case finding, EID and mVL testing, ART initiation, and back-to-care services to community health workers (CHWs), community nurses, and HIV diagnostic assistants; and 2) changing service sites to convenient locations in the community to overcome barriers to EID and mVL delivery. These strategies are intended to work in concert with the above evidence-based practices to integrate PAC-Man into the EMTCT program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPAC-Man

PAC-Man represents an integrated DSD model for mothers and infants that brings the following three evidence-based practices into the community for EMTCT: 1) pediatric active case finding using novel POC EID technology; 2) same-day ART initiation for infants newly diagnosed with HIV infection; and 3) mVL testing and back-to-care services. PAC-Man uses a mobile approach to offer EMTCT services in the community and reach "high risk" MIPs. Delivering the PAC-Man model will be done under the auspices of routine care, applying an overarching implementation strategy of creating new mobile care teams equipped with new diagnostic technology who deploy the m-PIMA in community settings.

BEHAVIORALStandard of Care

Routine care as provided by Ministry of Health.

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The criteria for Enumerated MIP Cohort is as follows: Inclusion Criteria: * Enrolled in the national EMTCT program at a study site in the 12 months preceding a survey.

Exclusion criteria

* None. The criteria for Enumerated MIP Field Survey is as follows: Inclusion Criteria: * Age 16 years or older. * Enrolled in the national EMTCT program at a study site in the 12 months preceding a survey.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 6 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 6 months among the enumerated cohort of MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 2 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 2 months among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.
Proportion of infants who receive EID testing by age 12 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 12 months among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.
Proportion of high-risk infants who receive EID testing by age 6 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants with high-risk mothers exposed to HIV who receive EID testing by age 6 months among all high-risk MIPs with infants at least 6 weeks old at all study sites.
Proportion of infants who initiate ARTWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIV who initiate ART ≤60 days from EID sample collection among the enumerated cohort of all infants.
Median infant results return timeWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programMedian number of days from infant EID sample collection to results returned to caregivers.
Proportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIVWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIV among the enumerated cohort of all infants.
Median age at ART initiation among infantsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programMedian age in months at ART initiation among infants who test positive for HIV.
Median time to ART initiation among infantsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programMedian number of days to ART initiation among infants who test positive for HIV.
Proportion of infants who initiate ART the same day as diagnosisWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants newly diagnosed with HIV who initiate ART on the same day as EID results received among the enumerated cohort of all infants.
Proportion of infants with HIV retained in care at 3 months post-ART initiationWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants with HIV who are retained in care at 3-months post-ART initiation.
Proportion of infants with HIV retained in care at 6 months post-ART initiationWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of infants with HIV who are retained in care at 6-months post-ART initiation.
Proportion of MIPs reached with viral load testingWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of mothers living with HIV who received MOH-recommended 6-monthly VL testing during pregnancy and breastfeeding among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Proportion of high-risk MIPs reached with viral load testingWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of high-risk MIPs living with HIV who received MOH-recommended 6-monthly VL testing during pregnancy and breastfeeding among all high-risk MIPs from the enumerated cohort.
Proportion of MIPs virally suppressed at 6 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of mothers with viral suppression (\<1,000 copies of HIV per ml.) at 6 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Proportion of high-risk MIPs virally suppressed at 6 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of high-risk mothers with viral suppression (\<1,000 copies of HIV per ml.) at 6 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Proportion of MIPs virally suppressed at 12 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of mothers with viral suppression (\<1,000 copies of HIV per ml.) at 12 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Proportion of high-risk MIPs virally suppressed at 12 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of high-risk mothers with viral suppression (\<1,000 copies of HIV per ml.) at 12 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Proportion of MIPs retained in care at 6 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of mothers who are retained in care (≥1 clinic encounter within the last 180 days) at 6 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Proportion of MIPs retained in care at 12 monthsWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of mothers who are retained in care (≥1 clinic encounter within the last 180 days) at 12 months after EMTCT enrollment among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Proportion of MIPs who resumed ARTWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of mothers who had documented treatment interruption (i.e., a treatment gap ≥28 days) who later resumed ART among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Proportion of MIPs who received enhanced adherence counselingWithin 12 months of MIP enrollment in the national EMTCT programProportion of MIPs who had unsuppressed viral load and then completed enhanced adherence counselling among the enumerated cohort of all MIPs.
Adoption - proportion of sites that adopt the PAC-Man model6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)Number of trained sites that deliver the PAC-Man intervention divided by the total number of trained sites. Study endline sustainability survey is conducted at the end of the trial once all study sites have been randomized to receive the intervention.
Adoption - proportion of providers who adopt the PAC-Man model6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)Number of trained providers who deliver the PAC-Man intervention divided by the total number of trained providers. Study endline sustainability survey is conducted at the end of the trial once all study sites have been randomized to receive the intervention.
Implementation - cost per pediatric case6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)Incremental cost of PAC-Man implementation per pediatric HIV case identified, compared to standard of care. Study endline sustainability survey is conducted at the end of the trial once all study sites have been randomized to receive the intervention.
Implementation - cost per unsuppressed MIP6-12 months after sites switch to intervention; study endline (Approximately 12 months from the time that last study sites are switched to the intervention)Incremental cost of PAC-Man implementation per pregnant and breastfeeding woman with unsuppressed viral load identified, compared to standard of care. Study endline sustainability survey is conducted at the end of the trial once all study sites have been randomized to receive the intervention.

Countries

Malawi

Contacts

CONTACTMichael Herce, MD, MPH
michael_herce@med.unc.edu9198435996
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael Herce, MD, MPH

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026