Skip to content

Neoadjuvant Intra-tumor Double Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant CT-Guided Intra-tumor Double Checkpoint Blockades for Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Amenable for Surgical Resection

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06492408
Enrollment
90
Registered
2024-07-09
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2033-12-30
Last updated
2024-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatic Cancer, Surgery

Keywords

Hepatocellular Carcinoma;, Intra-tumor injection, Neoadjuvant therapy, Surgery, Immunotherapy, CTLA4 antibody, PD1 antibody, PDL1 antibody

Brief summary

This trial is designed to investigate the safety, response rates and survival outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma by delivery of CTLA4 and PD1 or PDL1 antibodies combination through CT-guided intra-tumor (IT) injection.

Detailed description

Antibodies against CTLA4, PD1 or PDL1 are representative drugs for the check-points inhibitory agents, and their clinical indications have been approved in various types of tumors, including advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma and late recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients, et al. Those drugs are regularly systemically administrated by vein infusion, however, local delivery of those drugs via interventional radiology technique including trans-artery or intra-tumor injection may increase the local drug concentration of the tumor, improve the efficacy, and reduce systemic adverse reactions. CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab has been widely effectively using to combine with PD1 or PDL1 antibody and this study is to combine ipilimumab and PD1 antibody or PDL1 antibody, so called double checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy, as neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) via intra-tumor admistration. To the investigator's knowledge, no studies have been developed on the safety, efficacy and survival benefit of the double checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy for cancer patients as neoadjuvant treatment via intra-tumor delivery. This phase II clinical trial is designed to assess the safety and survival benefit of ipilimumab and pembrolizumab or durvalumab combination with or without chemodrug or bevacizumab as neoaduvant therapy on patients with HCC, including safety, pCR, mPR, PFS, ORR, DCR, and median survival time.

Interventions

This study has 3 subgroups: Arm 1. Ipilimumab +pembrolizumab or Ipilimumab +durvalumab is administrated with a total dose of 1-2mg/kg via intra-tumor fine needle injection in 10 min, every 3 weeks, total 3-4 times. Arm 2. Ipilimumab +pembrolizumab or Ipilimumab +durvalumab combined with idarubicin is administrated via intra-tumor fine needle injection in 15 min, every 3 weeks, total 3-4 times. Arm 3. Ipilimumab +pembrolizumab or Ipilimumab +durvalumab combined with idarubicin plus bevacizumab is administrated via intra-tumor fine needle injection in 20 min, every 3 weeks, total 3-4 times.

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed previously untreated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). If a diagnostic biopsy is available, a pre-treatment biopsy is not required. Patients with a suspected HCC are eligible, but pathology must be confirmed prior to initiating treatment on study. 2. The patient must be a suitable candidate for surgery, in the opinion of the treating physician. 3. Signed and dated written informed consent must be provided by the patient prior to admission to the study in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines and to the local legislation. 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score 0-1 5. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1.5 x 10\^9/L; Hemoglobin \>= 8.0 g/dL; Platelets \>= 100 x 10\^9/L; Total bilirubin =\< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (except subjects with Gilbert syndrome who can have total bilirubin \< 3.0 mg/dL); Creatinine =\< 1.5 x ULN or calculated creatinine clearance \>= 50 mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance calculation OR 24-hour urine creatinine clearance \>= 50 mL/min. 6. Birth control. 7. Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and laboratory tests.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients participated in clinical trials of equipment or drugs (signed informed consent) within 4 weeks; 2. Patients accompany by ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and esophageal and gastric varices bleeding; 3. Any serious accompanying disease, which is expected to have an unknown, impact on the prognosis, include heart disease, inadequately controlled diabetes and psychiatric disorders; 4. Patients accompanied with other tumors or past medical history of malignancy; 5. Pregnant or lactating patients, all patients participating in this trial must adopt appropriate birth control measures during treatment; 6. Patients have poor compliance. A.Impaired clotting test (platelet count \< 60000/mm3, prothrombin activity \< 50%). B.Renal failure / insufficiency requiring hemo-or peritoneal dialysis. C.Known severe atheromatosis. D.Known uncontrolled blood hypertension (\> 160/100 mm/Hg). 7. Allergic to contrast agent; 8. Any agents which could affect the absorption or pharmacokinetics of the study drugs 9. Other conditions that investigator decides not suitable for the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pCR rate for the study groupsSix monthsPathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as after neoadjuvant therapy, the surgical specimen can not find any residual cancer cells.
mPR rate for the study groupsSix monthsMajor pathologic response (MPR) is defined as pathological less than 10% survival cancer cells after tumor resection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Toxicity of the study groupsSix monthsToxicity is assessed by the National Cancer Institute \[NCI\] Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] version 4.
Response rates to neoadjuvant treatmentSix yearsResponse rates are assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] version 1.1.
Recurrence-free survivalSix yearsRecurrence-free survival is measured as routine.
Overall survivalSix yearsTo correlate major pathologic response with recurrence-free and overall survival.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactZhenfeng Zhang, MD, PhD
zhangzhf@gzhmu.edu.cn+862039195966
Backup ContactBingjia He, MD
464677938@qq.com+862039195965

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026