Skip to content

Mirror Therapy Combined With Task- vs. Impairment-oriented Rehabilitation Program

Effect of Mirror Therapy Combined With Task- vs. Impairment-oriented Rehabilitation Program in Individuals With Stroke

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06489938
Enrollment
123
Registered
2024-07-08
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2024-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Stroke

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Mirror Therapy

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the effects of mirror therapy combined with task- vs. Impairment-oriented rehabilitation programs as novel hybrid approaches in individuals with stroke. Participants will receive mirror therapy combined with the task-oriented rehabilitation program (MTT), mirror therapy combined with the impairment-oriented rehabilitation program (MTI), or task-oriented rehabilitation program combined with the impairment-oriented rehabilitation program (TI) 90 minutes per day, three days per week, for six weeks.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMirror therapy

In mirror therapy, a wooden mirror (41×50×33 cm3) will be positioned in the participant's sagittal midplane, blocking the participant's view of the affected arm performance. We will also provide a foldable bed tray table to ensure that the participants focus on the mirror reflection of the less affected arm. The mirror therapy will consist of movement and functional practices.

The task-oriented approach will provide both bimanual common-goal and dual-goal tasks for the participants.

BEHAVIORALImpairment-oriented approach

The impairment-oriented approach will focus on the movement components. Arm BASIS or Arm Ability training will be provided based on the severity of the participant's impairment.

Sponsors

I-Shou University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. A first-ever unilateral stroke ≥3 months 2. Age between 20 and 80 years 3. Baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score \>10 4. No severe spasticity in any joints of the affected arm 5. Ability to follow the instructions 6. No participation in other studies during the study period 7. Willingness to provide informed written consent.

Exclusion criteria

1\. Serious medical problems or poor physical conditions that might be detrimental to study participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer AssessmentBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA standardized tool for evaluating motor impairment for stroke
Revised Nottingham Sensory AssessmentBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA standardized tool for evaluating sensory impairment for stroke
Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity InventoryBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionAn assessment for bilateral functional abilities
Wolf Motor Function TestBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionAn assessment for both unilateral and bilateral functional abilities

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor Activity LogBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA self-report tool used to assess the amount and quality of use of an affected limb during daily activities
ABILHAND QuestionnaireBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA self-reported assessment tool used to measure manual ability by evaluating their perceived difficulty in performing bimanual tasks
Functional independent measureBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionAn assessment tool that evaluates a person's level of disability and functional independence in performing daily activities, covering areas such as self-care, mobility, communication, and social cognition
Box and block testBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA measurement for evaluating functional hand use by measuring the number of blocks moved within a set time
Stoke Impact ScaleBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA comprehensive self-reported questionnaire that assesses the impact of a stroke on life
Stroke Self-Efficacy QuestionnaireBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA tool used to evaluate a stroke survivor's confidence to perform daily activities
Stroke-Specific Measure of Adherence to Home-based ExercisesSix weeksA questionnaire designed to assess how consistently stroke participations follow prescribed home programs
Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living ScaleBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionAn assessment tool designed to measure a person's ability to perform daily activities
Grip and pinch powerBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionThe measurements of the strength of hand movements
Ten-meter walk testBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA test for measuring walking speed and stride length over a fixed distance to assess mobility and functional status
Berg Balance ScaleBaseline, six weeks, and 3 months after completing the interventionA measurement for evaluating balance abilities through a series of functional tasks

Contacts

Primary ContactYi-chun Li, Doctor
joyjoyfish@gmail.com+886-7-6151100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026