Skip to content

High Altitude Residents With High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension (HAPH), 6MWT Assessed at High Altitude (3200m) vs Low Altitude (760m)

Comparative Study of 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD) in Patients With High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension Permanently Residing Above 2500 Meters When Assessed Near Resident High Altitude (HA) at 3200m vs. at Low Altitude (LA) 760m

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06489691
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-07-08
Start date
2024-07-02
Completion date
2024-09-27
Last updated
2026-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension

Keywords

Pulmonary Hypertension, Hypoxia, High Altitude, 6-Minute Walk Test

Brief summary

To study the effect of relocation from 3200m (Aksay) to 760m (Bishkek) in highlanders with High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension (HAPH) who permanently live \>2500m on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)

Detailed description

This research in highlanders with HAPH diagnosed by echocardiography and defined by a RV/RA \>30 mmHg who permanently live at HA \>2500 m will perform a 6-minute walk distance test near their living altitude in Aksay at 3200 m and on day 2 and 7 at 760 m after relocation

Interventions

6-minute walk test (6MWT) will be performed according to clinical standards

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Each highlander with HAPH will perform a 6 MWT at 3200 m and at 760 m according to a prospective study design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Permanently living \>2500 m * HAPH diagnosed with a minimum RV/RA of 30 mmHg assessed by echocardiography at an altitude of 3200 m * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Highlanders who cannot follow the study investigations, * Patients with moderate to severe concomitant lung disease (FEV1\<70% or forced vital capacity \<70%), severe parenchymal lung disease, heavy smoking \>20 cigarettes/day or \>20 pack-years. * Coexistent unstable systemic hypertension or coronary artery disease that required adjustment of medication within the last 2 months * Regular use of medication that affects control of breathing (benzodiazepines, opioids, acetazolamide)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6-minute walk distance (6MWD) on day 2 of relocation to 760 mday 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange in 6MWD in meter between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6-minute walk distance (6MWD) on day 7 of relocation to 760 mday 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 m6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in meter between LA (760 m) and HA (3200 m)
Arterial oxygen saturation by pulseoximetry (SpO2) at rest and at peak 6MWD on day 2 of relocation to 760 mday 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange in SpO2 in % between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Arterial oxygen saturation by pulseoximetry (SpO2) at rest and at peak 6MWD on day 7 of relocation to 760 mday 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange in SpO2 in % between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Heart rate at rest and at peak 6MWD on day 2 of relocation to 760 mafter the first night at LA (760 m)Change in hear rate in bpm between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Heart rate at rest and at peak 6MWD on day 7 of relocation to 760 mday 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange in hear rate in bpm between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Blood pressure at rest and at 6MWD on day 2 of relocation to 760 mday 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange in blood pressure in mmHg between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Blood pressure at rest and at 6MWD on day 7 of relocation to 760 mday 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange in blood pressure in mmHg between LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Borg Dyspnea scale at end 6MWT on day 2 of relocation to 760 mday 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange of the Borg CR10 dyspnea scale at end of the 6MWT after the first night at LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Borg Dyspnea scale at end 6MWT on day 7 of relocation to 760 mday 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange of the Borg CR10 dyspnea scale at end of the 6MWT after seven nights at LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Borg leg fatigue scale at end 6MWT on day 2 of relocation to 760 mday 2 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange of the Borg CR10 leg fatigue scale at end of the 6MWT after the first night at LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)
Borg leg fatigue scale at end 6MWT on day 7 of relocation to 760 mday 7 at 760 m compared to 3200 mChange of the Borg CR10 leg fatigue scale at end of the 6MWT after seven nights at LA (760 m) vs HA (3200 m)

Countries

Kyrgyzstan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTalant M Sooronbaev, Prof. Dr.

National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine named after academician M.Mirrakhimov

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSilvia Ulrich, Prof. Dr.

University Hospital Zurich, Department of Pulmonology

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026