Skip to content

Irrisept vs Traditional Antibiotic Irrigation for Virgin Penile Prosthesis Placement

Irrisept vs Traditional Antibiotic Irrigation for Virgin Penile Prosthesis Placement: A Prospective Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06489431
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-07-05
Start date
2023-12-04
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction, Penile Prosthesis; Complications, Infection or Inflammation

Keywords

Inflatable Penile Prosthesis, Irrisept

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether intraoperative irrigation with Irrisept is not inferior to irrigation with multiple antibiotics during placement of a first time inflatable penile prosthesis device.

Detailed description

To conduct a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of all virgin penile prosthesis implantations with the goal of assessing Irrisept's candidacy as an alternative to traditional antibiotic irrigation (Rifampin, Gentamicin for all patients, with the addition of Amphotericin B if patient has a history of diabetics) during penile prosthesis surgery. The investigators believe that Irrisept provides adequate antibacterial and antifungal coverage to serve as an alternative to traditional antibiotic therapy. Additionally, the investigators believe a cost analysis would support the use of Irrisept in the event that non-inferiority is demonstrated.

Interventions

DRUGChlorhexidine

Irrisept is a self-contained jet lavage that contains chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) as a preservative to offer broad-spectrum activity against various microorganisms in the bottled solution

DRUGGentamicin

Aminoglycoside antibiotic irrigation

DRUGRifampin

Antibacterial known to inhibit DNA-dependent RNA polymerase

Sponsors

Rush University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
Irrimaxcorp
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Urological Surgeons of Northern California
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be aware of the two options, however will be randomly selected to receive only one of the two treatments. Investigators will be aware of the treatment as they are administering it

Intervention model description

Non inferiority trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria include all men undergoing penile prosthesis (any manufacturer) implantation (inpatient or outpatient)

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection Rate of Patients Receiving Traditional Antibiotic Irrigation vs Irrisept Only1-2 yearsAll patients will be closely followed with appointments at regular intervals for the first year after surgery to monitor for infections as per usual care

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREdward Cherullo, MD

Rush University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLaurence Levine, MD

Rush University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 25, 2026