Skip to content

ERAS in Totally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

The Safety and Efficacy of ERAS Clinical Pathway Intotally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy: a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06489288
Enrollment
2656
Registered
2024-07-05
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2024-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ERAS, Gastric Cancer, Laparoscopic Gastrectomy

Keywords

Gastric Cancer, ERAS, Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy

Brief summary

The number of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy is gradually increasing, but the safety of ERAS in these term is still unknown and further multicenter randomized controlled studies are needed.

Detailed description

The application of ERAS during the perioperative of gastric cancer surgery can reduce hospitalization time, costs, and surgical stress response without increasing complications and readmission rates, and may even have a certain effect on improving long-term survival rates of patients. However, some studies have also shown that ERAS may increase the number of postoperative readmissions while reducing hospitalization time, costs, and recovery time after surgery. At the same time, there is still no consensus on the application standards of ERAS during the perioperative period of gastric cancer surgery , and the comprehensive implementation of ERAS programs in clinical practice still faces huge challenges. With the widespread development of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy , the advantages of laparoscopy have been recognized. Multiple center studies have confirmed the safety of ERAS programs in totally laparoscopic distal radical gastrectomy. However, due to the complexity of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, there is currently no multi-center study to confirm the safety of ERAS in it. In order to better apply ERAS in clinical practice, better serve patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery, and provide more centers with practical experience in ERAS and even provide evidence for the establishment of a consensus on ERAS during the perioperative of gastric cancer surgery, our center will rely on platform advantages and previous work experience and collaborate with the CLASS Research Center to conduct a prospective, multi-center clinical study to explore the safety and effectiveness of ERAS clinical pathway in patients undergoing totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, providing a theoretical basis for further standardizing and promoting the application of ERAS concept in the perioperative clinical practice of gastric cancer surgery.

Interventions

OTHERERAS protocol

The ERAS process mainly includes removing the urethral catheter before the recovery of anesthesia, removing the abdominal drainage tube within 3 days after surgery, removing the nasogastric feeding tu

Sponsors

First Hospital of China Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Tongji Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Gansu Provincial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fudan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Changzhi People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhejiang University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xijing Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18-80 years; 2. ASA I-III; 3. ECOG ≤2; 4. NRS2002: 0-2; 5. Preoperative gastroscopy and pathological biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma; 6. The clinical stage of abdominal hypotonic enhanced CT or ultrasonic gastroscopy is cT2-3N0-3M0 or cT1N+M0 or cT4aN0M0 (according to the AJCC-8thTNM tumor staging); 7. Proposed D2 total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (without limitation on the anastomotic method); 8. All patients did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or other cytotoxic treatments before surgery; 9. Borrmann I-III ; 10. No history of upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy); no history of peritonitis or pancreatitis 11. hemoglobin ≥80g/L; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5×109/L; platelet ≥100×109/L; ALT, AST≤1 times the upper limit of normal; ALP≤1 times the upper limit of normal; total serum bilirubin <1.5 times the upper limit of normal; serum creatinine <1 times the upper limit of normal; serum albumin ≥35g/L;

Exclusion criteria

1. tumors at the esophagogastric junction or gastric tumors that have invaded the pyloric canal; 2. Those with uncontrolled epilepsy, central nervous system diseases, or a history of mental disorders; 3. Severe (i.e., active) heart disease, such as symptomatic coronary heart disease, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or more severe congestive heart failure, or severe drug-dependent arrhythmia, or a history of myocardial infarction within the last 6 months; 4. Patients with urinary dysfunction who require long-term indwelling catheters after surgery; 5. Patients who need immunosuppressive therapy for organ transplantation; 6. Patients with severe uncontrolled recurrent infections or other severe uncontrolled concomitant diseases; 7. Moderate or severe renal impairment \[creatinine clearance equal to or lower than 50ml/min (calculated according to the Cockroft and Gault equation), or serum creatinine > upper limit of normal (ULN); 8. Emergency surgery due to tumor emergencies (bleeding, perforation, obstruction); 9. Pregnant or breastfeeding women; 10. Previously diagnosed other tumors (excluding cervical cancer and cutaneous melanoma)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QLQ-STO22Changes in quality of life in QLQ-STO22 before surgery, on the 7th day after surgery, and 1 ,6,12month after surgeryChanges in quality of life in QLQ-STO22 before surgery, on the 7th day after surgery, and 1 ,6,12month after surgery
QLQ-C30 (V3.0)Changes in quality of life in QLQ-C30 (V3.0) before surgery, on the 7th day after surgery, and 1 ,6,12month after surgeryChanges in quality of life in QLQ-C30 (V3.0) before surgery, on the 7th day after surgery, and 1 ,6,12month after surgery
Complication rate1monthComplications rate and Clavien-Dindo classification within 1 month after surgery
DFS1 and 3 yearsDisease-free survival rate at 1 and 3 years after surgery

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026