Skip to content

A Comparison Between Posterior, Lateral and Medial Approaches for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Block

A Comparison Between Posterior, Lateral and Medial Approaches for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Block: A Randomized Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06489210
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-07-05
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2024-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nerve Pain

Brief summary

Background: Popliteal block is a widely used technique to provide anesthesia or analgesia for below-knee surgical procedures. In this study, the investigators compare ultrasound-guided popliteal blocks via posterior, lateral, and medial approaches to find out the approach with the best outcome.

Detailed description

Methods: In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, one hundred and twenty ASA physical status of class I and II patients undergoing below-knee surgery were involved. These patients were divided into three equal groups at randomly based on the route assigned for the US-guided popliteal block: the posterior, lateral, and medial approach groups. In this study, technical characteristics \[number of attempts to get the proper injection site and block performance time\], anesthetic and analgesic characteristics \[success rate, block onset, potency, and duration, time to ask, and the consumed amount of postoperative analgesia\], discomfort rate in respect to position and needle insertion and the associated complications were recorded.

Interventions

using ultrasound to detect sciatic nerve and popliteal fossa through different approaches using 20ml of the selected local anesthetic mixture (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of 2% lidocaine, each with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected incrementally

Sponsors

Helwan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

This study included * ASA physical status (PS) class I and II * weighing 70-85 kg, * undergoing elective below knee surgeries

Exclusion criteria

* patients who refused to participate in the study * those having an allergy to local anesthetics * peripheral neuropathy, coagulopathy * diabetes mellitus * severe hepatic * renal impairment * infection, mass and crush injury or open wound at the nerve block site * patients receiving chronic analgesic therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
assessment of intraoperative and postoperative pain in different groups after intervention24 hours after operationpain severity levels via visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS is a 10 cm horizontal line labeled no pain at one end and worst pain imaginable on the other end. The patient was asked to mark on this line where the intensity of the patient lies

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026