Skip to content

Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Obesity-Related Induction Complications in Nulliparae at Term 2.0

Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Obesity-Related Induction Complications in Nulliparae at Term 2.0 (APPOINT 2.0): A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06488781
Enrollment
787
Registered
2024-07-05
Start date
2025-04-29
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor Complication, Obesity in Pregnancy

Brief summary

Obesity increases the risk of pregnancy complications, including puerperal infections and cesarean delivery, and risk rises with increasing body mass index (BMI). Since obese women are more likely to have comorbidities that would necessitate delivery prior to their due date (i.e. prior to 40 weeks gestation), and class III obesity specifically is an indication for delivery by 39 weeks, these patients have a high rate of labor induction. In nulliparous women from the general population (obese and non-obese), labor induction at 39 weeks (compared to expectant management) is associated with less maternal morbidity and a lower cesarean rate. Researchers previously conducted a pilot randomized placebo-controlled trial in obese, nulliparous women undergoing labor induction at term and found that the cesarean delivery rate was lower in women who received a prophylactic antibiotic regimen during labor compared with those who received the placebo. Researchers proposed multi-center trial aims to test this hypothesis in a large sample with adequate power to determine whether prophylactic antibiotics during labor are associated with a decrease in the rate of cesarean delivery in term, nulliparous, obese women. If the findings from the pilot trial are confirmed, this would represent a novel intervention to decrease the cesarean delivery rate in a subset of women at highest risk for cesarean-related complications.

Detailed description

This is a multi-center randomized placebo-controlled trial in which nulliparous women with obesity who are undergoing induction of labor at term and not receiving IAP for GBS will be recruited (n=787). The participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either prophylactic antibiotics during their labor induction (azithromycin 500 milligrams intravenously once and cefazolin 2 grams intravenously every 8 hours for up to three doses) or like-appearing placebos. The participants and their obstetrical providers will be blinded to the study intervention. The study will be conducted with an identical protocol at six study sites. Trained research nurses/assistants at each study site will consent and enroll participants, collect biospecimens, and collect demographic information and data on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, and will convey this data to the primary site for analysis. Researchers hypothesize that the group that receives the study drug regimen of prophylactic antibiotics during induction of labor will have a lower rate of cesarean delivery than the group that receives the placebo. They also hypothesize that the group that receives the study drug regimen will have a lower rate of puerperal infection than the placebo group. Nulliparous women with obesity who are undergoing induction of labor at term will be eligible for participation in the study. Across all sites, 787 total subjects will be recruited.

Interventions

DRUGAzithromycin

Azithromycin 500 milligrams intravenously once and cefazolin 2 grams intravenously every 8 hours for up to three doses

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo given in place of other two active drugs

Sponsors

University of Oklahoma
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Case Western Reserve University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Study participants, clinical personnel, and members of the research team responsible for collecting clinical outcomes will be blinded to the treatment group allocation. The research pharmacist at each site and the research analyst generating the randomization scheme will be the only study team members to know the treatment group allocation.

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either the prophylactic antibiotic regimen or placebos during labor induction.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
15 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* BMI ≥30 * No prior deliveries at or beyond 20 weeks gestation * Undergoing induction of labor * Gestational age 37 weeks or more * Age 15-45 * Not receiving IAP for GBS prophylaxis

Exclusion criteria

* Fetal death prior to labor induction * Known fetal anomaly * Multiple gestation * Ruptured membranes for more than 12 hours * Chorioamnionitis or other infection requiring antibiotics at the start of the labor induction * Previous myometrial surgery * Allergy to azithromycin or beta-lactam antibiotics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of cesarean delivery30 days postpartumDetermine whether a prophylactic antibiotic regimen during labor induction will decrease the rate of cesarean delivery in obese, nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of chorioamnionitis development30 days postpartumDefined clinically by fever and maternal and fetal signs such as tachycardia and uterine tenderness
Rate of endometritis30 days postpartumMaternal development of endometritis
Rate of cesarean wound infection30 days postpartumRate of maternal would infection from cesarean section
Rate of postpartum hemorrhage30 days postpartumRate of maternal postpartum hemorrhage
Rate of blood transfusion30 days postpartumRate of maternal blood transfusions
Rate of intensive care unit admission30 days postpartumMaternal admission into intensive care unit
Rate of hospital readmission30 days postpartumMaternal hospital readmission after delivery
Rate of indications for cesarean delivery30 days postpartumRate of indications for a cesarean delivery
Maternal hospital stay30 days postpartumLength of maternal hospital stay
Neonate hospital stay30 days postpartumLength of neonatal hospital stay
Rate of NICU admission30 days postpartumNeonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission
APGAR score30 days postpartum5-minute APGAR score \<4 (neonate)
Rate of respiratory distress syndrome30 days postpartumDevelopment of infant respiratory distress syndrome
Rate of sepsis30 days postpartumInfant sepsis (either suspected or confirmed)
Rate of necrotizing enterocolitis30 days postpartumInfant necrotizing enterocolitis
Periventricular leukomalacia30 days postpartumDevelopment of periventricular leukomalacia in infant as seen by ultrasound
Rate of intraventricular hemorrhage30 days postpartumIntraventricular hemorrhage grade III or higher
Neonatal death30 days postpartumDeath of neonate

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTStephanie Pierce, MD
stephanie-pierce@ouhsc.edu405-271-8787
CONTACTChristy Zornes, MHR
christy-zornes@ouhsc.edu405-271-8001
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORStephanie Pierce, MD

University of Oklahoma

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026