Bipolar Depression, Bipolar Disorder (BD)
Conditions
Keywords
nutrition intervention, nutritional psychiatry, bipolar disorder, dietary intervention, brazilian dietary guideline
Brief summary
Individuals with Bipolar Disorder (BD) have twice the risk of being affected by metabolic comorbidities and a 1.8-fold increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular diseases when compared to the general population. These factors are fundamental in the 14-year reduction in the life expectancy of people with TB reported in recent meta-analyses. This occurs mainly due to the increased inflammation associated with the disease, the adverse effects of pharmacological treatments and unhealthy lifestyle habits that are more common in people diagnosed with BD. Nutrition has been studied as an adjunctive treatment in other psychiatric disorders, but there is a lack of studies about the role of nutrition in TB. Considering that diet can impact metabolic health, this randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effect of a nutritional intervention on cardiovascular risk in patients with TB. The intervention is based on the dietary pattern recommended in the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population and will be applied by a registered dietitian. According to the literature, the sample size will be 72 individuals with TB (36 in the control group with usual treatment + 36 in the intervention group added to the usual treatment). The intervention will be carried out in 7 individual sessions and 8 group sessions with specific themes. The primary aim of this protocol will be an intervention to contribute to cardiovascular health - verified by serum markers, anthropometric measurements and the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score (algorithm used to estimate an individual's 10-year cardiovascular risk). The secondary stages will be the adherence of the intervention and the impact on the quality of life of the participants. The possible positive results of this nutritional intervention can open new clinical perspectives. Meaning that might show that better food choices can protect the cardiovascular health of individuals with TB, leading to a reduction in morbidity and mortality associated with the disease.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALNutritional intervention
7 individual sessions (online) + 6 small group sessions (1-in person + 5 online)
Sponsors
University of Sao Paulo
Deakin University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Control group vs intervention group
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of Bipolar disorder types I and II diagnosis * Adults of both genders, from 18 to 60 years old * In typical pharmacotherapy for BD, for at least one month * Agreement to participate in the study with signature of the consent form
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with "very good or excellent" diet quality assessed by the diet quality scale (ESQUADA): \>275 out of a score of 375 * Patients in a state of hypomania or mania: score \>8 (Young Mania Rating Scale - YMRS) * Patients with severe depression \>21 Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale * Patients at low cardiovascular risk (\<7 points for men or \<9 points for women on the Framingham Global Risk Score) * Low weight or eutrophic body mass index: \<25kg/m² as in similar studies * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patients diagnosed with anorexia and bulimia nervosa * Patientes diagnosed with Irritable Bowl Syndrome or other diagnosed conditions that affect the gastrointestinal function
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| waist circumference | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | waist circumference |
| C reactive protein | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | C reactive protein |
| Total cholesterol and fractions | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | Total cholesterol and fractions |
| Glycemia | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | Glycemia |
| Glycated hemoglobin A1C | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | Glycated hemoglobin A1C |
| Triglycerides | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | Triglycerides |
| HOMA IR | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | HOME IR |
| Apoliporpotein B | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | Apoliporpotein B |
| Cardiovascular risk | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | Framingham Global Risk Score (-3 to 21; higher scores mean worse outcome) |
| Body weight | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | Body weight |
| Body fat percentage | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | Body fat percentage |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dietary assessment - dietary intake | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | 3-day food record from last week (calories and macronutrients) |
| Dietary assessment - dietary quality | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | ESQUADA (0-375; higher scores mean better outcome) |
| Dietary assessment - dietary adehrence | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | NUTRINET (0-72; higher scores mean worse outcome) |
| Quality of life WHOQOL | Baseline, week 12, week 24 and follow up at week 52 | WHOQOL Bref Portuguese (0-100; higher scores mean better outcome) |
Countries
Brazil
Outcome results
None listed