Skip to content

Asleep Fiberoptic vs Direct Laryngoscopy Effect on Hemodynamic Stability Using Opioid Free Anesthesia Induction

Asleep Fiberoptic vs Direct Laryngoscopy Effect on Hemodynamic Stability Using Opioid Free Anesthesia Induction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06487988
Enrollment
68
Registered
2024-07-05
Start date
2024-09-11
Completion date
2026-06-09
Last updated
2026-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesics, Opioid, Anesthesia, General, Blood Pressure, Heart Rate

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare blood pressure and heart rate between the fiberoptic and direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction. Secondary objectives include comparing the time needed for intubation and the incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and upper airway trauma in adults aging between 18 to 55 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. The main question it aims to answer is: Does fiberoptic intubation cause less hemodynamic instability than direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction?

Detailed description

Background: Intubation has always been linked to a transient increase in blood pressure and heart rate that could be deleterious in elderly and hemodynamically unstable patients. Fiberoptic intubation, which is currently used for suspected difficult intubation, could cause less marked rise in blood pressure and heart rate. Furthermore, "opioid free anesthesia" has gained popularity lately to avoid opioid adverse effects ranging from respiratory depression, postoperative ileus, sedation, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention. Specific aims: The primary objective of this study is to compare blood pressure and heart rate between the fiberoptic and direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction. Secondary objectives include comparing the time needed for intubation and the incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and upper airway trauma. Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 90 (45 in each group) adults aging between 18 to 55 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, will be recruited over 1 year of work. Patients will be randomly allocated to 2 groups: The direct conventional laryngoscopy group performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade, and the fiberoptic guided intubation group. Significance: Studies comparing hemodynamic stability using fiberoptic intubation versus direct oral intubation in opioid free anesthesia are limited. The present study will assess whether fiberoptic intubation causes less hemodynamic instability than direct oral intubation in opioid free anesthesia induction, which will benefit patients with normal airways.

Interventions

DEVICEdirect conventional laryngoscopy

direct conventional laryngoscopy will be performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade.

DEVICEfiberoptic guided intubation

fiberoptic guided intubation will be performed.

Sponsors

American University of Beirut Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I and II * Range age of 18-55 years' old * Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* History of cardiovascular diseases. * History of lung disease. * Hypertensive patient (BP\> 140/90) * Patient taking medications that affect blood pressure and heart rate * Morbid obesity (BMI \>30) * Severe GERD * Predicted difficult airway (Short TMD \<6 cm, Upper li bite test grade III, Mallampati score \>III) * Neck instability * Patient planned to receive rapid sequence intubation * Patient refusal to participate * History of difficult intubation/ ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart ratebaseline and up to 5 mins upon intubationHeart rate (bpm)
Blood pressurebaseline and up to 5 mins upon intubationBlood pressure (mm Hg)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time needed for intubationbetween face mask removal and first ETCO2 reading in minutestime (between face mask removal and first ETCO2 reading in minutes)
incidence of postoperative sore throatafter 24 hrsSore throat pain (0-10)
incidence of upper airway traumaduring intubationincidence of upper airway trauma (Yes or No)

Countries

Lebanon

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristian Rouphael, MD

American University of Beirut Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 11, 2026