Skip to content

Neural Mobilization and Cerebral Palsy

Effect of Neural Mobilization, Compared to Conventional Physical Therapy, in Children Diagnosed With Cerebral Palsy. A Pragmatic Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06485830
Acronym
NEUROREHAB
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-07-03
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2025-05-15
Last updated
2026-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Neurologic Disorder

Keywords

range of motion, pain intensity, gross motor function, neural mobilisation, quality of life, muscle stiffness, muscle tension

Brief summary

Objective: To assess the effect of neural mobilization applied to the lower limbs, compared to conventional physical therapy, in children diagnosed with Cerebral Palsy. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, the investigators will try to evaluate the impact of the intervention in aspects related with structure, activity, and participation.This project will mainly focus on the structure dimension. More specifically, the investigators aim to observe if a treatment protocol designed to modify the structure (e.g.,the sciatic nerve using neural mobilization techniques), will evoke changes not only in the structural dimension, but also will be able to modify the activity and participation dimensions. Design: A single blinded randomized clinical trial (the evaluator will remain blinded to treatment allocation group) will be conducted. The experimental group will receive an intervention consisting on the use of neurodynamic mobilization procedures of the lower limb and participants in the control group will undergo a conventional physical therapy intervention (stretching, mobilization), without the use of neural mobilization. Subjects: Participants will be aged between 5 and 18 years, and with a confirmed diagnosed of Cerebral Palsy with the presence of spasticity in the lower limbs. Methods: Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: experimental or control group. The primary outcome will be the range of motion (flexion and extension) of the hip, knee and ankle. Secondary outcomes will include gross motor function, pain intensity, muscle stiffness, muscle tension, and functional measures.

Interventions

PROCEDURENeural mobilization of the lower limb

Static neural mobilization techniques will be performed for the lower limb. Static procedures will consist of two sets of 10 repetitions, with one minute rest between sets. Next, dynamic neural mobilization techniques will be performed, with each exercise lasting 5 minutes per set, with one minute rest between them. Therefore, dynamic procedures will consist of 10 minutes per mobilization technique (with one minute rest between exercises). At the end of all dynamic mobilization exercises, static mobilizations of the sciatic nerve will be performed again in the same order and with the same duration. The intervention will consist of a total of 8 sessions (either twice a week for four weeks or once a week for a total of 8 weeks). This will depend on the participant usual attendance to his/her treatment center

PROCEDUREConventional physical therapy

The intervention will include a first part in which active mobilizations, active-assisted mobilizations, and active stretches will be performed, followed by activities aimed at improving physical training, mobility training, and strength training oriented towards specific tasks. After this second part, the first part will be repeated in the same order and duration. The intervention will consist of a total of 8 sessions (either twice a week for four weeks or once a week for a total of 8 weeks). This will depend on the participant usual attendance to his/her treatment center

Sponsors

University of Seville
Lead SponsorOTHER
Instituto de Biomedicina (IBiS) de Sevilla
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Sealed opaque envelopes will be used for treatment allocation. The research in charge of collecting the outcome measures will remained unaware of treatment allocation group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children and adolescents diagnosed with Cerebral Palsy or presence of spasticity and aged between 5 and 18 years. * Level I to IV in the Gross Motor Function Classification System, which denotes that the participant should be able to walk with or without using assistive devices. * Increased muscle tone in the lower extremities, represented by a score greater than 0 on the Tardieu clinical scale and a positive response in the Duncan Ely test. * Ability to communicate pain. * Ability to follow simple commands.

Exclusion criteria

* Have ankle joint arthrodesis or any surgical operation that prevents joint mobilization of the lower limb to some degree. * Any significant change in medication treatment during the study period that may influence (increase or decrease) muscle tone. * Experience uncontrolled epileptic seizures despite medication. * Have received botulinum toxin treatment in the lower limb within the 3 months prior to the study. * Undergo a different physical therapy treatment parallel to that developed in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of motionFrom baseline to up to 8 weeks, with a 3-month and a 6-month follow upPassive range of motion will be assessed for flexion and extension of the hip, knee, and ankle. Using a handheld goniometer, each joint will be measured three times, using the average of the three measures for subsequent analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported pain intensityFrom Baseline to up to 8 weeks, with a 3-month and a 6- month follow upCurrent self-reported pain intensity during the most passive Straight Leg Rise test, as assessed with a 0 to 10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).T he Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a 11-point rating scale that ranges from 0, which denotes no pain at all, to 10, which denotes the maximum bearable pain. This has been selected as the most recommended and valid tool to evaluate self-reported pain intensity.
SpasticityFrom Baseline to up to 8 weeks, with a 3-month and a 6- month follow upSpasticity of the hamstrings and adductor muscles will be measured using the modified Tardieu scale. The modified Tardieu Scale is the most common tool used in the clinical setting to evaluate the level of muscle spasticity. The muscle response to a slow and fast stretching will be collected. There are two parts to the assessment that are applied to each muscle group that is examined. In the first part of the assessment, the health professional slowly moves the person's limb to observe the full range of their available movement. In the second part of the assessment, the same limb is moved quickly. Both range of motions (in response to a slow and a fast movement) will be measured using a goniometer. Higher scores represent a lower level of spasticity
Activity and ParticipationFrom Baseline to up to 8 weeks.,with a 3-month and a 6- month follow upThe Gross Motor Function Classification System will be used to assess activity dimensions related to standing and walking, while the Functional Mobility Scale will evaluate participation by measuring the time taken to walk 5 and 50 meters. Final scores in the Gross Motor Function Classification System will be categorised in five different levels (I to V), with lover levels denoting higher level of walking independence. For the Functional Mobility Scale, a rating of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 is given for each distance, with higher values representing higher levels of independence.
Health-related quality of lifeFrom Baseline to up to 8 weeks, with a 3-month and a 6- month follow upThe Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire will be given to parents or legal tutors of participants (when applicable) or to study participants (depending on their age) to analyze the relationship of the condition with the environment. There are different versions, including a primary caregiver/parent report for children aged 4 to 12 years; and a self-report for children aged 9 to 12 years. Another version has been designed for adolescents aged 13-18 years. Higher scores denote higher levels of well-being.
MyotonometryFrom Baseline to up to 8 weeks, with a 3-month and a 6- month follow upMuscle tone and muscle stiffness will be measured using a myotonometer. Assessment points will be marked with a non-invasive demographic pencil on the select points: hamstring muscles, the rectus femoris muscle, and the adductor muscle. Two points will be located in the muscle belly of the abovementioned muscles. At each point, muscle tone and stiffness will be measured using a device called MyotonPRO MyotonPRO (Myoton AS, Estonia). The MyotonPRO is small,non-invasive, and it has shown good validity and high reliability in larger and smaller body muscles.This device delivers a multi-scan mode of three brief mechanical impulses, each one shortly followed by a quick release, to record the damped natural oscillation of the muscle using an accelerometer. Evaluations will be made in both sides.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORAlberto M. Heredia Rizo, PhD

Instituto de Biomedicina (IBiS) de Sevilla

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 5, 2026