Skip to content

Comparison Between the Efficacy of CIMT and NDT Along With Conventional Physiotherapy Treatment on Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Among Patients of Stroke

Comparison Between the Efficacy of CIMT and NDT Along With Conventional Physiotherapy Treatment on Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Among Patients of Stroke

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06485583
Acronym
CIMT
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-07-03
Start date
2024-06-28
Completion date
2025-01-29
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Strokes Thrombotic

Keywords

(CIMT), (NDT)

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy of CIMT and NDT among stroke patients To study the phenomena of transfer of training To study relationship between the MMSE score and stroke rehabilitation

Detailed description

This research aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of CIMT and NDT, supplemented by conventional physiotherapy, in the rehabilitation of upper extremity function among stroke patients. The findings will inform clinical practice, guiding the development of optimized, patient-centered rehabilitation strategies.

Interventions

is a rehabilitation technique used to improve motor function in people who have had a stroke or other neurological conditions. CIMT restricts the use of the unaffected limb, typically with a mitt or sling, to encourage the use of the affected limb.

Therapy, is a rehabilitation approach used to address movement and motor control deficits in people with neurological illnesses such as stroke, cerebral palsy, or traumatic brain injury.

Sponsors

Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants will be aged 40-65 years and will have experienced either a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke with hemiplegic presentation within the past 1 to 6 months. Additionally, they must have a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 23.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with visual or auditory deficits, musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders, mental impairments, or a history of surgery will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
upper extremity rehabilitation6 WEEKSThe Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) by Carr and Shepherd is a clinical tool used to evaluate upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke patients. It assesses motor recovery through eight items, each reflecting daily activities, scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (unable to perform) to 6 (optimal performance). For upper extremity assessment, the MAS includes tasks like hand movements (grasping, releasing, manipulating objects), advanced hand activities (fine motor skills such as writing or buttoning a shirt), and upper arm function (reaching, lifting, placing objects). Patients perform these tasks while clinicians observe and score their performance. The MAS provides a quantitative measure of motor recovery, facilitating progress tracking, goal setting, and personalized therapy interventions, making it a reliable and straightforward tool for capturing functional changes in stroke patients.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026