Skip to content

Differences of the Postoperative Outcome for Carotid Surgery Patients Treated by Either Male or Female Surgeons

Differences of the Postoperative Outcome for Carotid Surgery Patients Treated by Either Male or Female Surgeons

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06485102
Enrollment
800
Registered
2024-07-03
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid Stenosis

Keywords

Carotid Artery, Apoplexy, Surgical outcome, Gender specific outcome, Surgeon gender

Brief summary

This research will focus on the differences of the postoperative outcome for carotid surgery patients treated by either male or female surgeons. Since 2012, in Germany, the surgical treatment of carotid stenosis has an established quality assurance, making the thematic especially suitable for testing the surgical results of either male or female surgeons.

Detailed description

Data about physician gender having impact on the treatment quality of a patient first appeared in 1999, the publication being about patients with breast cancer. This discussion was resumed in 2016 when Y. Tsugawa et. al showed that female doctors have, in comparison to male doctors, better treatment results. Primary outcomes for the study were mortality and readmissions, which were lower if the treatment has been done by a female doctor. Until today, there are only a few reports about the role of physician gender, especially that of surgeons, in the treatment quality. Studies like the ones from Blohm et. al and Wallis et. al show that female surgeons have a better outcome and a lower mortality, 30 days after the surgery. Wallis et. al also showed that the correlation between male surgeons and female patients have the worst results\]. None of the studies that were written until today focussed on carotid surgery. Since 2012, in Germany, the surgical treatment of carotid stenosis has an established quality assurance, with specific documentation and a standard surgical course of action. This is why we consider that this surgery is especially suitable for comparison of results, depending on surgeon genders.

Interventions

PROCEDURECarotid Surgery in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic stenosis

Carotid Surgery in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic stenosis

Sponsors

Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital Augsburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Age above 18 years * All the patients that had a carotid revascularisation between jan. 2012 and dec. 2023.

Exclusion criteria

\- No quality assurance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The impact of surgeons' gender, team gender and patients gender on postoperative apoplexy0-30 daysstroke \[observed in a time frame of 30 days after the operation\]
The impact of surgeons' gender team gender and patients gender on postoperative peripheral nerve lesions0-30 daysImpairment of peripheral cervial nerves \[observed in a time frame of 30 days after the operation\]
The impact of surgeons' gender team gender and patients gender on reinterventions0-30 daysNumber of patients with surgical revision
The impact of surgeons' gender team gender and patients gender on procedure related death0-30 daysNumber of patients who died following surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The impact of surgeons' gender team gender and patients gender on procedure time0-30 daysDuration of surgery measured in minutes
The impact of surgeons' gender team gender and patients gender on the length of stay0-30 dayslength of stay in days

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026