Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer and provide evidence-based guidance to the selection of the most appropriate operative technique at Sohag University Hospital. The study will include patients presented with perforated peptic ulcers as a complication of peptic ulcer disease during the period of study.
Interventions
PROCEDUREopen repair of perforated peptic ulcer
group (A) includes patients with perforated peptic ulcer that will be operated by open repair approach
PROCEDURElaparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer
group (B) includes patients with perforated peptic ulcer that will be operated by laparoscopic repair approach
Sponsors
Sohag University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* All patients with a clinical diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer that are fit to undergo surgery either via laparotomy or laparoscopy, males or females, any age, with gastric or duodenal ulcer, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I, II, III.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with associated bleeding ulcer (additional steps are needed to control bleeding). * Patients with associated pathology other than perforated peptic ulcer. * Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade IV, V, VI.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Early postoperative follow up for repair of perforated peptic ulcer | 3 days after the operation | resumption of oral intake |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactHussam F Muhammad, Resident
Backup ContactAyman M Ahmad, Professor
Outcome results
None listed