Skip to content

Real-life Dual-Task Training

Real-life Dual-Task Training for Older Adults at Risk to Fall

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06479694
Acronym
Real-DTT
Enrollment
4
Registered
2024-06-28
Start date
2024-07-03
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2026-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fall

Brief summary

Older adults have difficulty optimizing two tasks at once and typically experience greater interference than younger adults when dual-tasking, meaningful that there is greater decline in performance of at least one task when comparing single and dual-tasking. Difficulty dual-tasking may actually predict falls in community-dwelling older adults. Dual-task training has been shown to improve cognitive outcomes (attention, memory), motor outcomes (balance, gait), and dual-task performance in older adults; however, most dual-task training involves simulated tasks that do not reflect functional dual tasks in the real world. Greater dual-task improvements could be seen when training functionally specific tasks. One way to increase task specificity is to offer real-life, contextually-relevant, dual-task training embedded in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Limited evidence exists for dual-task training interventions for older adults with T2DM; however there is early evidence of improvements in cognitive and motor effects with simulated dual-task training, which could translate to improved dual-task performance, reduced impact on everyday life, and reduced fall risk. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a real-life dual-task training program for older adults at risk to fall.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALReal-life Dual-Task Training

The intervention is Real-life Dual-Task Training (Real-DTT) which uses instrumental activities of daily living training with explicit focus on the cognitive and motor elements and when to focus attention to one vs. the other to reduce fall risk. The Real-DTT sessions will be delivered once a week for 10 weeks during their occupational therapy sessions, delivered by a licensed occupational therapist. Real-DTT is a modified version of occupational therapy, with a protocol tailored to the participants.

Sponsors

Colorado State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* at least 65 years old * ambulatory around the home with or without an assistive device * answered yes to at least one of the fall risk questions with their therapist * scheduled to receive occupational therapy services with instrumental activity of daily living goals through Covell Care.

Exclusion criteria

* Not fluent in English * Self-reported diagnosis of dementia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dual-Task Impact on Daily-living Activities Questionnairebaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the interventionThe Dual-Task Impact on Daily-living Activities Questionnaire is a 19 question self-report assessment with scoring from 0-76. Higher scores indicate greater dual-task inference during daily activities.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibilityimmediately after interventionThe Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure will be used to assess feasibility and acceptability. The assessments are 12 questions in total scored 12-60 with greater scores indicating greater acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility.
Dual-Task Performancebaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the interventionDual-task performance will be classified into one of 4 categories (gait priority trade off, cognitive priority trade off, mutual interference, or mutual facilitation) based on performance in 3 different 2-minute conditions (gait single task, cognitive single task, dual-task). The gait task will be overground walking on a 12 meter obstacle-free course with a 1 meter turning area. Gait speed (m/s) will be calculated using the total distance covered over the 2 minutes. The cognitive task will be serial subtractions of seven, starting between 590-599. A corrected response rate will be calculated as: responses per second\*percent of correct responses. Dual-task performance will represent a participant's performance on improvement or decline on both gait and cognitive performance comparing single and dual-tasking. For example, mutual interference would be a decline in both gait (slower speed), and cognitive (lower corrected response ratio) from single to dual-tasking.
Frenchay Activities Indexbaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the interventionThe Frenchay Activities Index is pragmatic for community-dwelling adults to self-rate participation in three domains: domestic chores, leisure/work, and outdoor activities. Frenchay Activity Index scores range from 0-45, with higher scores indicating greater participation in instrumental ADLs.
Self-reported Fallsbaseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the interventionParticipants will be asked: "Have you fallen in the last three months?" If yes, participants will be asked how many falls occurred in the last three months. Falls are defined as: "a unintended loss of balance with a result of coming to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 3, 2026