Skip to content

Compare the Efficacy and Outcome Between Fentanyl and Morphine as Analgo-sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Compare the Efficacy and Outcome Between Fentanyl and Morphine as Analgo-sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06479655
Enrollment
116
Registered
2024-06-28
Start date
2024-07-15
Completion date
2025-12-30
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effect of Drug

Brief summary

The primary aim of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of fentanyl vs morphine as analgosedation in mechanically ventilated adult patients in the ICU. This study also aims to compare the outcomes of patients between the two groups. The main questions it aims to answer are : 1. Does propofol and fentanyl infusion as analgo-sedation achieve targeted sedation score at 12 and 24 hours compared to propofol and morphine infusion in mechanically ventilated adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU)? 2. Is there a difference between the proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation dose between the fentanyl and morphine groups?

Detailed description

Researchers will randomize patients into 2 groups (Fentanyl and Morphine) and will start study drug accordingly for sedation in ICU.Proportion of patients from each group achieving targeted sedation score at 12 and 24 hours following initiation of the drug and proportion of patients from each group requiring rescue sedation dose will be recorded and analyzed. Furthemore duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay and 14 days mortality rate will recorded and compared between this 2 groups of patients.

Interventions

DRUGFentanyl

Intravenous fentanyl infusion with dilution of 10mcg/ml

DRUGMorphine

Intravenous morphine infusion with dilution 1mg/ml

Sponsors

Universiti Sains Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized control trial, two arms

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 years old * Patients who are expected by the ICU team to require invasive mechanical ventilation in ICU for at least more than 24 hours and for whom the ICU team decides to initiate continuous infusion of sedation * A patient who was ventilated and sedated not more than 12 hours before ICU admission.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with chronic use of narcotics * Patients with chronic liver failure or end-stage renal failure * Patients with severe chronic neurocognitive dysfunction * Patients with drug overdose * Patients with a known allergy to either morphine or fentanyl * Patients who are receiving neuromuscular blockers * Patients who are pregnant * Patients who are diagnosed to have severe traumatic brain in

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RASS score at 12 and 24 hours24 hours from study drug initiationTo determine the proportion of patients achieving the targeted sedation guided by RASS score at 12 and 24 hours in both fentanyl and morphine group.
Rescue sedation doses24 hours from study drug initiationTo determine the proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation doses between fentanyl and morphine group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of mechanical ventilation90 DaysTo compare the duration of mechanical ventilation between the fentanyl and morphine groups
Length of ICU stay90 daysTo compare the length of ICU stay between the fentanyl and morphine groups
14 days mortality rate14 days from randomizationTo compare 14-day mortality rates between the fentanyl and morphine groups

Countries

Malaysia

Contacts

Primary ContactMohd Zulfakar Mazlan Dr, MBBS
zulfakar@usm.my+60135335566
Backup ContactSaravana Raj Joseph, MD
ragan_23@hotmail.com+6017 9570541

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026