Skip to content

Postural Assessment of Stroke Patients by Pose Estimation and Effects of Dynamic Core Postural Chain Stabilization

Postural Assessment of Stroke Patients by Pose Estimation and Effects of Dynamic Core Postural Chain Stabilization Techniques

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06478069
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-06-27
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

This study focuses on a two-pronged strategy to enhance the rehabilitation of stroke patients. It first investigates the application of pose estimating technologies to objectively measure posture.

Detailed description

This can entail capturing a patient's body position with cameras or other sensors in order to detect any imbalances or variations from normal posture brought on by the stroke. The study also looks at how well dynamic core postural chain stabilization (DCS) methods work for stroke recovery. The goal of DCS exercises is to increase stability and strength in the core, which can help with general postural control. This research aims to optimize stroke patient rehabilitation by combining a precise evaluation approach with a focused intervention strategy, which may result in improved balance, movement, and functional abilities.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTGroup A

Group A was treated with Ibuprofen Dosage After breakfast and after dinner for 6 weeks.

BEHAVIORALGroup B

Group B was treated with physical therapy; (Upper limb: The stroke patient warmed up with some gentle stretches for the wrist and fingers to get the muscles ready. They subsequently engaged in resistance training using dumbbells or resistance bands to increase the strength of their upper limbs. Bicep curls, tricep extensions, and shoulder presses were some of these exercises. They tried to complete two to three sets of ten to fifteen repetitions for each exercise, progressively increasing the resistance as their strength increased. Then, to improve dexterity and coordination in daily tasks, functional exercises were included.

Sponsors

Superior University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stroke, either ischemic or hemorrhagic * Standing ability and ability to perform basic movements with assistance * Willingness to take part in the intervention and evaluations

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cognitive impairment hindering participation * Unstable medical conditions affecting rehabilitation * History of other neurological disorders affecting posture

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Berg Balance Scale12 MonthsFor evaluating balance in a variety of functional tasks, the BBS is a commonly used and validated test. After the intervention period, the BBS scores of the control group and the intervention group (who received DCS techniques) can be compared. The efficacy of DCS in enhancing postural control would be strongly supported by a statistically significant increase in the intervention group's BBS score.
Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) Score12 monthsThe total score for TIS ranges between 0 for a minimal performance to 23 for a perfect performance. In a recent version of the TIS (version 2.0) for adults, the static subscale was removed because of a ceiling effect, total score ranges between 0 and 16 points

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026