Assessment of Implants Placed in Consolidated Graft With Different Bone Drills.

ASSESSMENT OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED IN MANDIBULAR CONSOLIDATED ILIAC-CREST BONE GRAFTS USING DENSAH BURS VERSUS THE STANDARD DRILLS (A Randomized Controlled Trial)

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06477874

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-27

Start date

2024-06-09

Completion date

2025-04-01

Last updated

2024-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Graft; Mechanical Complications, Implant Complication

Keywords

Bone graft, Iliac crest, Implant stability

Brief summary

The anterior iliac crest is a popular source of bone harvest. However, when fused to the intramembranous jaw bones, it yields low-density bones that qualitatively and quantitatively endanger the fixture's stability. In 1994, Summers first documented using the bone-condensing approach to improve the primary stability of dental implants. This study aims to determine whether osseodensifying the consolidated mandibular bone grafts will improve implant stability and marginal bone loss

Interventions

PROCEDUREDental implants placement

implants placed in consolidated bone grafts

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 55 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients of both sexes with an age range of 18-55 years. 2. Patients subjected to a successful iliac crest mandibular bone graft after segmental mandibular resection. 3. A minimal ridge height of ten millimeters and a ridge width of seven millimeters. 4. Healthy soft tissue coverage, with a reasonable interaction space.

Exclusion criteria

1. Clinical or radiographic signs of graft infection, rejection, or massive resorption. 2. The previous exposure to radiotherapy or chemotherapy. 3. Any systemic disease that would affect bone healing or implant osseointegration.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Radiographic bone loss	6 months osseointegration period	Calibration of the amplitude of vertical bone loss

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Implant stability	6 months osseointegration period	Calibration of primary and secondary implant stability quotient

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMaged Seleet, PHD

magedseleet@hotmail.com01000367625

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026