Skip to content

BeFluBu vs FluBuRux Conditioning in Haploidentical HCT

Randomized Trial of Benadamustine Versus Ruxolitinib With Fludarabine and Busulfan Conditioning in Recipients of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06477549
Enrollment
220
Registered
2024-06-27
Start date
2024-06-21
Completion date
2029-06-30
Last updated
2024-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Biphenotypic Acute Leukemia, Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Myeloproliferative Neoplasm

Brief summary

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation irrespective of the conditioning intensity and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis is associated with high frequency of primary and secondary graft failure. Different technologies of with replete or depleted graft are associated with 7-20% of graft failures in different diseases. Fludarabine and busulfan conditioning is the most commonly used approach for a variety of diseases. In two previously completed trials of addition of either bendamustine and ruxolitinib to conditioning we observed low rates of primary graft failure with both approaches. The study is the direct randomized comparisons of these two approaches with the primary aim of reducing composite events of primary graft failure, relapse and non-relapse mortality. The stratas for the study are Disease Risk Index (DRI) and the age of the haploidentical donor (\<35 vs ≥35).

Interventions

DRUGBendamustine Hydrochloride

Days -7 through -6: Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 iv x 2 days

DRUGRuxolitinib

Days -7 through -2: ruxolitinib 5 mg tid per os

Sponsors

St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have an indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning for malignant disease * Diagnosis: acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, mixed lineage acute leukemia, lymphoblastic lymphoma, chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, myeloprolipherative neoplasm * Age ≥18 * Malignant disease in hematologic response: \<5% of clonal blasts in the bone marrow and no clonal blasts in peripheral blood. * Patients with 5-9/10 HLA-matched related donor available. The donor and recipient must be identical by the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1. * Peripheral blood stem cells or bone marrow as a graft source

Exclusion criteria

* Titer of anti-donor anti-HLA antibodies ≥ 5000 at the time of inclusion * Moderate or severe cardiac disease: ejection fraction \<50%, unstable angina, stable angina NYHA class III or IV, chronic heart failure NYHA class III or IV, Lawn grade V arrhythmia, myocardial infarction within 3 months before inclusion * Stroke within 3 months of inclusion, unless related to the underlying malignancy * Severe decrease in pulmonary function: FEV1 \<50% or DLCO\<50% of predicted or respiratory distress or need for oxygen support; * Severe organ dysfunction: AST or ALT \>5 upper normal limits, bilirubin \>1.5 upper normal limits, creatinine \>2 upper normal limits * Creatinine clearance \< 40 mL/min * Uncontrolled bacterial or fungal infection at the time of enrollment defined by CRP\> 70 mg/L * Requirement for vasopressor support at the time of enrollment * Karnofsky index \<70% * Pregnancy * Somatic or psychiatric disorder making the patient unable to sign informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-free survival2 yearsMeasure: Kaplan-Meier estimate of either relapse, primary or secondary graft failure or death from all causes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of HSCT-associated adverse events (safety and toxicity)125 daysToxicity assessment is based on presence of NCI CTC AE 5.0 event grades 3-5. Veno-occlusive disease incidence and severity assessment is based on EBMT criteria 2020. Transplant-associated microangiopathy incidence assessment is based on Harmonization criteria by Schoettler et al. All toxicity measurements will be aggregated as severity scores
Infectious complications, including analysis of severe bacterial, fungal and viral infections incidence100 daysproportion of patients, requiring systemic treatment for bacterial, viral and fungal disease
Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV125 daysCumulative incidence of patients with acute GVHD II-IV grade, competing risk is death, relapse and primary graft failure
Incidence of moderate and severe chronic GVHD2 yearsCumulative incidence of patients with moderate and severe chronic GVHD according to NIH 2015 criteria, competing risk is death, relapse and primary graft failure
Cumulative incidence of primary and secondary graft failure365 daysCumulative primary and secondary graft failure, competing risk is death and relapse
Overall survival analysis2 yearsMeasure: Kaplan-Meier estimate of death from all causes
GVHD-relapse-free survival analysis2 yearsMeasure: Kaplan-Meier estimate of death, acute GVHD grade III-IV, severe chronic GVHD or relapse
Relapse cumulative incidence analysis2 yearsCumulative incidence of patients with relapse, competing risk is non-relapse mortality
Non-relapse mortality analysis2 yearsCumulative incidence of patients with mortality without hematological relapse of malignancy

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactIVAN SERGEEVICH MOISEEV
moisiv@mail.ru0079217961951
Backup ContactYulia Vlasova
jj_vlasova@mail.ru

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026