Skip to content

Residual Embolism Evaluated With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

Residual Embolism Evaluated With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography - The RESPECT Cohort

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06473610
Acronym
RESPECT
Enrollment
358
Registered
2024-06-25
Start date
2024-06-27
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Circulation Obstruction

Keywords

scintigraphy

Brief summary

Major progress achieved in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies has substantially improved the short-term prognosis of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). These improvements have led to a shift from an acute to a chronic condition of venous thromboembolism, justifying the recent development of Chronic Thrombo-embolic Disease (CTED). In most of the situations, it is due to a residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO) which can be assessed by pulmonary scintigraphy.

Detailed description

Planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy is the gold standard, but for several months, V/Q single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is recommended in the guidelines. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performances of various SPECT protocols to quantified RPVO and compared to planar scintigraphy to evaluate the RPVO.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient addressed to nuclear medicine department of Saint-Etienne public hospital for V/Q pulmonary SPECT-CT assess to rule out perfusion obstruction, admitted for a suspicion of pulmonary hypertension (PH), or a persistent dyspnea after PE * Patient affiliated ou beneficiary of social security.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant patient. * Patient addressed to nuclear medicine department for acute pulmonary embolism. * Impossibility of the entire protocol acquisitions realization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RPVO (%)At inclusionEvaluation of the RPVO establish with Meyer score (planar scintigraphy, 2D). The higher the percentage, the greater the obstruction of the lung
Segmental visual scoreAt inclusionEvaluation of segmental visual score (SPECT-CT , 3D) The higher the percentage, the greater the obstruction of the lung

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactPierre-Benoit BONNEFOY, MD
pierre-benoit.bonnefoy@chu-st-etienne.fr(0)4 77 82 94 43
Backup ContactNATHALIE PREVOT, MD
nathalie.prevot@chu-st-etienne.fr(0)4 77 82 94 43

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026