Skip to content

Sectional Versus Full Glass Ceramic Laminate Veneers

Marginal Adaptation, Color Stability and Clinical Performance of Sectional and Full Glass Ceramic Laminate Veneers. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06472180
Enrollment
22
Registered
2024-06-25
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2025-05-01
Last updated
2024-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spacing of Anterior Teeth

Keywords

Mini-veneers, partial veneers, porcelain fragments, sectional veneers, laminate veneers

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to assess the marginal adaptation, color stability and clinical performance of glass ceramic sectional veneers compared to full laminate veneers There's two null hypotheses , the first is that there is no difference in the marginal adaptation of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneers. the Second is that there is no apparent change in color stability and clinical performance of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneers.

Detailed description

Although seeking for more minimally invasive treatment modalities with the use of the new advancements in ceramics and adhesive materials, however there is insufficient clinical studies assessing the ultraconservative sectional veneers has been published although there are many published case reports proving their success . Hence the aim of this study is to assess the sectional veneers compared to laminate veneer regarding marginal adaptation, color stability and clinical performance

Interventions

partial laminate veneer

Glass ceramic laminate veneer

Sponsors

October University for Modern Sciences and Arts
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

double blinded Data analyst, statistician and patient will be blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients seeking for esthetics with the following criteria * Male or female patients age range above 18 years old * Minor esthetic defects in anterior region * Multiple spacing * diastemas * Incisal fracture * Initial proximal caries * Patients able physically and psychologically to tolerate restorative procedures * Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation * Class I occlusion

Exclusion criteria

* Patients free of: * Tempromandibular disorders * Para-functional habits * Cracked teeth * Moderate or deep caries * Heavily discolored teeth * Heavy smokers * Enamel defects compromising bonding * Active periodontal disease * Pulpal disease * Mobility * Occlusal disturbances * Class II and III occlusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal adaptation of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneer using digital device intraoral scannerBaseline,3,6,9,12 monthsassessment of the marginal adaptation using digital device intraoral scanner software

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Color stabilityBaseline,3,6,9,12 monthsassessment of the Color stability using intraoral scanner
Clinical performanceBaseline,3,6,9,12 monthscategorical outcome of clinical performance using FDI(World Dental Federation) criteria

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026