Skip to content

Upfront Surgery Versus NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery for Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer: SNAC Study

Upfront Surgery Versus NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery for Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer (SNAC Study): An Observational Retrospective Multicenter Study With Matched Treatment Comparison

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06472063
Acronym
SNAC
Enrollment
684
Registered
2024-06-24
Start date
2022-09-22
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Cancer

Keywords

upfront surgery, perioperative treatment, D2 lymphadenectomy

Brief summary

Based on the concerns about the actual low strength of evidence of the efficacy of NAC on survival of proper gastric cancer treated with adequate D2 gastrectomy as compared to the results of optimal upfront surgery (S), and considering the actual difficulties of additional RCTs, the aim of this study is to assess the non-inferiority of upfront surgery alone with optimal D2 dissection compared to NAC regimens followed by surgery. Methods: This is a nationwide Multicenter observational retrospective study with matched comparison of two therapeutic strategies (NAC vs S). We will include patients with cT\>2, every cN M0, or with every T and N+ M0, histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach, submitted either to pre- or peri-operative treatment and D2 gastrectomy or to upfront D2 gastrectomy, between January 2012 and December 2019, followed by adjuvant treatment when recommended. All patients matching the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be registered into the study and classified into one of the two arms: a, patients who underwent pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy (NAC) or b, patients submitted to upfront D2 gastrectomy (S). Given the results reported in the FLOT trial, a 3-years OS of 55% in the control arm (NAC) was assumed. Three-year OS in the experimental arm (S) was assumed to be 47.4% under the null hypothesis of inferiority and 55% under the alternative hypothesis of non-inferiority. A sample size of 684 patients (342 in each arm) achieves 80% power to detect a non-inferiority margin Hazard Ratio of 1.25

Interventions

OTHERpre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy

pre- or perioperative treatment and D2 gastrectomy

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
CollaboratorOTHER
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
CollaboratorOTHER
Federico II University
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Modena
CollaboratorOTHER
Istituti Tumori Giovanni Paolo II
CollaboratorNETWORK
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
CollaboratorOTHER
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedale di Circolo - Fondazione Macchi
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedale San Donato
CollaboratorOTHER
Government hospital in Forlì, Italy
CollaboratorOTHER
Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda ULSS di Verona e Provincia
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia
CollaboratorOTHER
A.O. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
CollaboratorOTHER
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
CollaboratorOTHER
Provincia Autonoma di Trento
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Florence
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedale M. Bufalini Cesena
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo di Monza
CollaboratorOTHER
A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza
CollaboratorOTHER
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedale Santo Stefano
CollaboratorOTHER
Policlinico Abano Terme
CollaboratorOTHER
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona
CollaboratorOTHER
Humanitas Hospital, Italy
CollaboratorOTHER
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 3.1.1. Locally advanced (T\>2 any N or N+ any T) histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach without distant metastases (M0) and without infiltration of adjacent structures and organs. 3.1.2. D2 lymphadenectomy (based on Japanese gastric cancer guideline) 3.1.3. Age \> 18 years 3.1.4. surgical resectability 3.1.5. follow-up time of at least 36 months.

Exclusion criteria

3.2.1. distant metastases (cM+) or infiltration of adjacent structures or organs (cT4b) and all primarily not resectable stages 3.2.2. Other types of lymphadenectomy lower than D2 3.2.3. Siewert type I and II Cardia cancers 3.2.2. Relapsed gastric cancers 3.2.3. malignant secondary disease, dated back \< 5 years (exception: In-situ-carcinoma of the cervix uteri, adequately treated skin basal cell carcinoma) \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
overall survival3- and 5- year follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
disease free survival (DFS)[ Time Frame: 2-year follow-up ]
Perioperative Morbidity and MortalityTime Frame: up to 2 months after surgery
R0-Resection rate2 months after surgery
Rate of NAC patients submitted to surgery3 years
Rate of NAC patients completing postoperative treatment3 years

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactRossella Reddavid, MD
rossella.reddavid@unito.it+393479848651

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026