Skip to content

Romosozumab Versus Denosumab in Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis: an Extended Observation of a Randomized Controlled Trial at 48 Months

Romosozumab Versus Denosumab in Patients With Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis: a 2-year Extension Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06472050
Enrollment
54
Registered
2024-06-24
Start date
2024-08-20
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glucocorticoids Toxicity, Osteoporosis

Keywords

glucocorticoids, osteoporosis, fracture, romosozumab, denosoumab, outcome

Brief summary

The investigators conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) in chronic glucocorticoid (GC) users with moderate/high risk of fracture to compare the efficacy and tolerability of romosozumab (ROMO) for 12 months followed by denosumab (DEN) for 12 more months vs DEN for 24 months throughout. Superiority of ROMO/DEN to DEN/DEN in raising the spine bone mineral density (BMD) was demonstrated at month 12 and month 24. The present study was to report the further BMD changes at 48 months (2 year extension) for those participants who were maintained on DEN treatment.

Detailed description

The investigators conducted a pilot open-label 24-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the efficacy of romosozumab (ROMO) with denosumab (DEN) in moderate/high risk adult patients using long-term GCs (defined as a daily prednisolone dose of ≥5mg/day for ≥12 months). All patients had moderate to high risk of osteoporotic fracture as evidenced by at least one of the following: (1) a personal history of fragility/vertebral fracture; (2) dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T score ≤-2.5 \[age ≥40 years\] or Z scores ≤-3.0 \[age \<40 years\] at spine, hip or femoral neck; or (3) high risk of 10-year FRAX-estimated major fracture). Of the 70 patients enrolled, 63 completed the study. At month 12, the spine bone mineral density (BMD) increased significantly in both the ROMO and DEN groups. The spine BMD gain from month 0-12 was significantly greater in ROMO-treated patients (p\<0.001). Although the hip BMD at month 12 also increased significantly in the ROMO and DEN groups, the BMD gain was not significantly different between the groups. At month 24, the spine BMD continued to increase in both the ROMO and DEN groups, and the BMD gain remained significantly greater in ROMO-treated patients. As there are no long-term data on the sequential use of ROMO and DEN in patients with GIOP, the current 2-year extension study is planned to observe the BMD changes at the spine and the hip of patients in the two treatment groups at month 48.

Interventions

DRUGRomosozumab

osteoporosis treatment

DRUGDenosumab

osteoporosis treatment

Sponsors

Tuen Mun Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. patients who are continued on 6-monthly subcutaneous injection of DEN in either the ROMO or DEN arms after month 24 in our original RCT 2. Those who are willing to have a repeat DXA assessment at the end of 4 years.

Exclusion criteria

1. patients who refuse to be maintained on denosumab after month 24; 2. patients who are maintained on other anti-osteoporotic drugs after month 24; and 3. patients in whom prednisolone is planned to be tapered or discontinued after month 24.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in BMD at the lumbar spine24 more months after RCT completionspine BMD

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in BMD at non-dominant hip and femoral neck24 more months after RCT completionhip and femoral neck BMD

Countries

China

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChi Chiu Mok, MD, FRCP

Tuen Mun Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026