Skip to content

AI-Guided (GenAIS TM) Versus Standard Physician-Guided Dietary Supplementation for Managing Metabolic Syndrome

AI-Guided (GenAIS TM) Versus Standard Physician-Guided Dietary Supplementation for Managing Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06470399
Enrollment
160
Registered
2024-06-24
Start date
2023-02-02
Completion date
2024-06-05
Last updated
2025-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome

Keywords

AI-guided dietary supplementation, Metabolic parameters improvement, Genetic profiling, metabolic profiling

Brief summary

The study AI-Guided (GenAIS TM) Versus Standard Physician-Guided Dietary Supplementation for Managing Metabolic Syndrome aimed to compare the effectiveness of AI-guided dietary supplement (DS) prescriptions versus standard physician-guided prescriptions in managing metabolic syndrome. This 6-month randomized controlled trial included 160 participants diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. Participants were divided into two groups: one received DS based on physician judgment, and the other based on GenAIS AI system analysis. Primary outcomes focused on changes in metabolic parameters, while secondary outcomes included individual components of metabolic syndrome, inflammation levels, body weight, and adherence to the DS regimen. Data collection involved genetic, metabolic, and clinical profiling, with ethical considerations ensuring participant confidentiality and informed consent.

Interventions

Participants receive DS prescriptions from a physician based on current standard practices, which include biochemical markers, genetic data, and metabolic profiles.

Participants receive DS prescriptions determined by GenAIS, is an AI system that considers genetic data, metabolic profiles, biochemical markers, and patient history.

Sponsors

S.LAB (SOLOWAYS)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 40 and 75 years. * Diagnosed with metabolic syndrome, defined by the presence of at least three of the following criteria: * Waist circumference \> 102 cm (men) or \> 88 cm (women). * Triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL. * HDL cholesterol \< 40 mg/dL (men) or \< 50 mg/dL (women). * Blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mm Hg. * Fasting glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL. • Willingness to provide genetic and metabolic data.

Exclusion criteria

* Significant renal, hepatic, or cardiovascular diseases. * Use of dietary supplements that affect metabolic parameters within the last 3 months. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Metabolic Syndrome Score6 monthsThis includes measuring and tracking changes in the five main components of metabolic syndrome: waist circumference, triglycerides, high-density lipoproteins ( HDL) cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting glucose. These components are central to the definition of metabolic syndrome and are commonly used to assess the efficacy of interventions. The Composite Metabolic Syndrome Score combines multiple metabolic risk factors and typically ranges from 0 (optimal) to 5 (worst), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein change6 months
Waist Circumference change in cm6 months
Triglycerides change in mg/dl6 months
HDL Cholesterol change in mg/dl6 months
Fasting Glucose in mg/dl6 months
Body Weight change in kg6 months
body mass index (BMI) change6 months
Incidence of any Adverse Effects6 months
Blood Pressure change in mmHg6 months

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026